North Carolina to consider DC option

The trustees of the $65 billion North Carolina Retirement Systems will vote on whether to introduce a defined contribution plan when the board meets on Jannuary 20, one of the significant recommendations by the Future of Retirement Study Commission.

The Commission, which was created by the board of trustees and tasked with reviewing all major aspects of benefit design, has recommended the choice between a defined benefit and defined contribution plan for all current and future employees, and automatic enrolment in a supplemental DC plan for future hires.

The NCRS’ current defined benefit plan has been under some scrutiny, with its consultant Ennis Knupp recommending in June last year that it was in need of a formal asset liability study and that for the size and complexity of its investments, it was chronically under staffed.

Last financial year was the first in the fund’s history that the General Assembly did not make the full annual required contribution.

At the upcoming board meeting, trustees could either pass the motion requesting the General Assembly adopt some or all of the Commission’s recommendations, or make additional recommedations of its own, but the decision to make any changes to the pension system ultimately lies with the General Assembly.

If the commission’s recommendations are adopted, the state retirement system will manage and regulate the DC plan in conjunction with existing 401(k) or 457 accounts, which are provided by Prudential Retirement.

Sponsored Content

The commission did not recommend a financial services company for the vendor of the new plan, instead suggesting the state invite proposals.

The commission recommended the default investment for the DC plan should be a lifecycle or target date fund, while also suggesting it should have the same employer costs as the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System (TSERS) and the Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS).

Leave a Comment

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Three decades of investing have given Monte Tarbox sharp eyes for recognising risk and opportunities, and he’s putting it to use as the new permanent chief investment officer of the $306 billion NYC Bureau of Asset Management. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, Tarbox outlines his vision for the fund, why he’s bullish on infrastructure but “nervous” on PE, and why he hasn’t drunk the TPA “Kool-Aid”.

Sort content by

Sweden’s AP2 takes bigger bites of China

The European pension fund has been increasing allocations to China A-shares and to Chinese bonds. The fund is managed primarily in-house and has crafted bespoke indices for ESG integration.

Railpen: good partners add skills

When the $37 billion pension fund embarked on a joint venture with the Alaska Permanent Fund and Kuwait's Public Institution for Social Security, it learned the value of complementary partnership

Textron seeds new products for edge

The $10 billion Textron pension fund lowers fees and increases its influence by backing new product designs with capital. CIO Charles Van Vleet embraces active and some blasts from the past.

Railpen reaps benefits of in-house team

Adding nearly two dozen staff and boosting its expertise in order to manage its property and equity assets has paid off in savings – and more importantly control – for the UK’s RPMI Railpen.

Australia’s VFMC goes whole-of-portfolio

CIO of the A$60.4 billion ($46 billion) Victorian Funds Management Corporation, Russell Clarke, discusses adopting centralised portfolio management as part of a quest for continuous improvement.

CalPERS seeks ideal pay formula

The $350 billion CalPERS is under time pressure to find the right formula on compensation - competitive but not an incentive for excessive risk - as key investment roles remain vacant.

Previous