Size and scalability up, fees down

The world’s largest asset managers should be using the advantages of their size and scalability to adjust their fee structures, according to Craig Baker, the global head of manager research at Towers Watson, which just released this year’s Pensions & Investments/Towers Watson World 500.

“The advantage of large managers is [that] they could structure their fees to be more advantageous,” Baker says. “They should decrease fees as their asset size goes up. This should be an advantage of being a large asset manager.”

He says manager charges should be specific to a particular investment strategy with a distinction of how much it costs to run that strategy divided across the client base, and then a performance fee charged on top of that.

“The way fee structures work in this industry is that everyone charges the same, which doesn’t really work.”

How they lined up

According to the World 500, Blackrock remains the world’s largest funds manager by assets under management, with $3.512 trillion, followed by Allianz Group, State Street Global Advisors, Vanguard and Fidelity Investments.

Sponsored Content

The total in assets under management by the 500 managers was down 2.5 per cent for the year to $63 trillion.

Baker says market or beta movement accounts for a lot of the fall, as well as the fact equities markets fell compared with bond markets, and there was less merger-and-acquisition activity among the largest managers globally.

The top 20 managers make up about 40 per cent of the total.

United States managers dominate the list, with about half of the total assets. Further, the US managers in the top 20 managed about 64 per cent of that group’s assets.

From 2006 to 2011 the fastest growing managers globally have been Great-West Lifeco from Canada, Nippon Life Insurance from Japan and Wells Fargo from the US.

Baker is now head of investment research across Towers Watson, as well as head of investment research. This means the Thinking Ahead Group and the asset research team also report to him, which he says allows for coordination across research themes, ideas and implementation.

At Towers Watson those themes include sustainability, smart beta, and risk and governance.

Baker says the asset research group has a view that most government bonds are very expensive.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous