PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020.

After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that anticipate a sustainable future, and the first and most obvious starting point for implementing the change is liquid equities.

As a result of this approach, coal companies will be largely eliminated from the PFZW portfolio by 2020 and investments in fossil fuels will be reduced by 30 per cent.

With this first step, AUM for CO2 reduction within market cap equities is about $31 billion. “We are intolerant of high CO2 emissions,” principal director of strategy at PGGM, Jaap van Dam, says.

For PGGM this asset class is managed close to the benchmark in an index-plus strategy and will focus on energy, utilities and materials sectors which have the biggest CO2 emitters.

“We have done intensive analysis, and the expected tracking error for the ESG customised benchmark is about 0.3 per cent annualised versus the former broad FTSE global benchmark.

Sponsored Content

The changes will mean the portfolio will stay sector neutral and there is not much change from a risk or factor exposure perspective,” van Dam says.

“We expect return to be equal to the generic FTSE benchmark. Deviations from benchmark in terms of tracking error are relatively small and we do not expect systematic under- or outperformance as we control for sector risks [and] country risks and have not observed noticeable factor tilts such as quality, value, min volatility, momentum, size.”

The number of holdings scaled down will be between 200 and 250, but importantly, engagement remains a core part of the approach.

“We chose not to optimise the strategy but to have a clear rule-based approach. Optimisation is anonymous. We want to be able to have a conversation with the companies affected.

“Collectively, as investors and consumers, we are part of the world in which carbon plays a large part, so we will do it gradually. Painting your front door green doesn’t change the real world,” he says.

“We want to inspire other investors to go down this route. On our own we can’t change the world.”

While the first instance will see a focus on equities, in the next few years the agenda will expand to credit investments, and real estate is also being investigated.

The gradual move allows companies a chance to move too, says van Dam, with the aim to inspire other investors about the ease of putting their money where their mouth is.

“This says to companies that we believe the world should be more CO2 efficient and we are engaging with you, and you can move this way too.”

It can also be seen as “cheap insurance against a high CO2 price”, says van Dam, with the portfolio moving from CO2-intensive emitters to CO2-efficient companies by 2020.

The important starting point for this decision was the White Sheet of Paper project which determined very clear beliefs about being a sustainable pension plan.

Van Dam acknowledges there was significant potential tension between two of the fund’s objectives – namely, financial ambition and sustainability.

“We had an intense conversation with the investment committee of PFZW, and together developed the path towards this solution which satisfies both the financial and the sustainability objectives. The portfolio or benchmark can move from CO2 intensive to CO2 reduction within the same sectors,” van Dam says. “These are relatively small changes in the makeup of the portfolio. This was a key for PFZW to sign up for this strategy.”

 

Asset Owner:PGGM / PFZW

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous