Fund collaboration first step to joint investment

European pension fund service providers PGGM and PKA have agreed on an innovative knowledge exchange that eventually aims to look for joint investment opportunities as well as improving the way the funds conduct risk management and the benchmarking of investments, costs and socially responsible investing.

Martin van Rijn, chief executive officer for Dutch pension fund service provider, PGGM, says that while the knowledge exchange is in its infancy, both organisations aim to be catalysts for greater research and improved investment approaches.

In a statement to Top1000funds.com van Rijn lists the areas of cooperation as:

  • Deepening of research and fact finding on risk management
  • Creating joint venture investment opportunities and benchmark selection
  • Sharing and benchmarking of socially responsible investment (SRI) methodology
  • Benchmarking of costs and cost transparency
  • Developing of common projects on membership involvement.

The knowledge exchange is the first of its kind for PGGM, but van Rijn says that cooperation with other potential partners is a realistic possibility.

“PGGM is always interested in cooperating with compatible partners,” he says.

“When a pension fund service provider has the same goals, profile, core values and operates in a similar market, we would be interested to explore the possibilities.”

Sponsored Content

 

Synergies say it all

Van Rijn explains that the two organisations have a number of synergies, which include a strong consideration of social, environmental and corporate governance (ESG) factors in their investments.

PKA and PGGM are signatories to the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and screen investments based on pre-established ethical principles.

When it comes to their investments, the funds also both invest in DONG Energy, a Danish company with interests in offshore oil extraction and renewable energy.

Both organisations invest on behalf of several pension funds with participants in the health and social sector in their respective countries.

PGGM manages, on behalf of six pension funds, around €115 billion ($151.6 billion) in pension assets for 2.5 million people. The Dutch pension fund service provider offers pension management, integrated asset management, management support and policy advice to its institutional customers.

PKA is a joint administration company for five Danish pension funds and has $27.7 billion in assets under management on behalf of 250,000 members of the health care and social sectors. Along with managing investments for the funds, PKA handles administration.

PGGM oversees – like PKA – a hybrid defined contribution/defined benefit scheme.

PKA manages investments according to the particular strategies decided by each of the five pension funds – even though they are similar and their asset allocations alike.

 

Responsible action

As part of integrating socially responsible investment principles into its investment strategies, PKA uses British ESG research EIRIS as part of all investments and Hermes EOS for the ongoing engagement activities.

Also conducting engagements itself, PGGM has in recent years expanded its SRI team, and since 2001 has used UK asset manager F&C Investments to complement its in-house activities. These include what it describes as “structural, systematic and visible dialogue with the financial markets and the individual companies” the organisation invests in.

As part of its responsible investment program it has also sought collaboration with other investors, including a recent working group on agriculture investment.

In conjunction with this collaborative work, PGGM has published a position paper outlining its approach to investing in agriculture, including an explanation of its investments in agricultural commodities.

Asset Owner:PGGM / PFZW

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous