Future Fund takes big step for corporate governance

The A$58 billion ($46 billion) Australian Future Fund has made a number of corporate governance-related decisions, including bringing its proxy voting for domestic shares in-house and the creation of an environmental, social and governance risk management function.

 

Gordon Hagart has been appointed to lead the Fund’s approach to environmental, social and governance risk management, while Rebecca Farrell will develop and implement a proxy voting policy.

The Future Fund has to date left proxy voting up to its funds managers (except for its Telstra shares), after first ensuring each manager’s governance outlook aligned with its own. Farrell will help in-source the voting decisions on Australian holdings, but any decision on hiring an external proxy voting adviser for offshore holdings is some way down the track.

The Fund has about 10 per cent of its portfolio in Australian equities, while 15.5 per cent is in global developed markets, and 3 per cent is in global developing markets. It still has about 41 per cent in cash.

Sponsored Content

Hagart will focus on influencing Future Fund investee companies to appropriately manage their environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks to protect shareholder value. He will also work with the broader investment team to identify relevant investment opportunities, particularly on environmental grounds.

Hagart will start in October, reporting to general manager Paul Costello with a ‘dotted line’ to chief investment officer David Neal.

Hagart joins the Future Fund from consultancy onValues, a Switzerland-based firm that combines traditional investment analysis with knowledge of environmental, social and governance drivers.

His career history includes the role of programme manager with the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), where his responsibilities included the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. The Future Fund is not yet a signatory.

Meanwhile, Rebecca Farrell’s efforts to develop and implement a proxy voting policy for the Future Fund commence immediately. Farrell was most recently a partner corporate governance with Clarendon Lawyers, was previously a senior associate with Freehills in its corporate governance advisory team and has also worked as a
transactional lawyer in Melbourne and New York.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Did they say that? CIO quotes from 2013

Each year conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com interviews CIOs and executive staff of the world’s largest asset owners, gaining insight into their investment strategy, asset allocation and demands from managers. In 2013 funds were focused on costs, increased portfolio look-through, “partnering” with managers and how to position fixed income exposures. This selection of quotes from CIOs of some of

Merton’s message: give up on alpha

Nobel Prize winner, Robert Merton, has thrown down the gauntlet. He claims that by focusing on a retirement income goal he can beat any competitor that is managing a 70:30 portfolio that has wealth accumulation as the goal. Do you dare take him on? The defined contribution pension management industry has it wrong, according to

New York’s budget, how would you spend it?

The city of New York spent $472.5 million on asset manager fees in 2012/13. The allocation of these funds is part of the $68 billion annual budget the City Comptroller has to run the city of New York. The bureau of asset management that oversees the $137.4 billion in pensions fits within that budget, but

Carbon credit market gets a boost

Norway and Britain have both announced plans to buy carbon credits, giving the United Nation’s struggling Clean Development Mechanism a boost.   Sovereign institutions have thrown a lifeline to the United Nation’s struggling Clean Development Mechanism, CDM, set up under the Kyoto Protocol which awards tradable carbon credits to projects like wind farms or solar

Contingent-COLAs the cornerstone of reform success

What can other states can adopt from the pension reforms at Rhode Island. The most significant item from the pension reform at Rhode Island is the fact the Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) is conditional. Or in other words, the fund will only pay the COLA if it can afford to do so. This simple

UK local authority funds question “bigger is best”

UK local authority schemes are under pressure to merge. It’s their turn to suggest ways in which pooling investments, or adminstriation, could achieve the economies of scale necessary for survival, but many are resisting the notion that “bigger is better” when it comes to investments.   The United Kingdom’s local government pension schemes have begun

Previous