Future Fund lags behind long-term objectives

Australia’s $77.63 billion Future Fund is lagging behind its long-term investment objectives, achieving a nominal annual return of 5.2 per cent over the past five years.

The sovereign wealth fund’s latest quarterly report reveals that since its first contributions were made in May 2006, the fund has failed to meet its initial investment aims after its first five years.

The fund has an investment mandate of a 4.5 to 5.5 per cent return above the Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of inflation over the long-term.

This 5.2 per cent nominal return is also currently below the benchmark set by the fund’s Board of Guardians of at least a 5 per cent return above CPI over rolling 10 year periods.

Board chair David Murray expressed confidence in the long-term investment strategy of the fund.

“The portfolio’s positioning and our dynamic approach to building and adjusting the portfolio, has helped generate solid performance for the fund since inception and positions it appropriately for its long-term mandate,” Murray said.

Sponsored Content

When the fund was founded, the investment mandate also prohibited the fund from engaging in excessive risk and acknowledged that returns may fall behind its investment objectives in the initial set-up period.

The fund improved its returns this year, posting a 12.4 per cent return for the year, up from 10.6 per cent the previous year.

However, the sovereign wealth fund’s latest quarterly report reveals it has experienced a flat final quarter of the year, achieving just an additional 0.6 per cent return.

Murray said the fund had achieved positive returns in a difficult environment.

“We have witnessed an extremely difficult economic environment over the last few years and this is continuing to present challenges,” Murray said.

More than $7.81 billion had been added to the overall value of the fund’s assets for the year ending June 30.

The Future Fund has sought to further diversify its portfolio and has boosted its allocation to hedge funds in the final quarter of the year and decreased its holdings of cash.

Since the beginning of April the Australia’s sovereign wealth fund has allocated an additional 2.3 per cent ($328 million) of its portfolio to alternative assets, which consist of a range of hedge fund and hedge fund of fund strategies.

This takes its total allocation to alternatives to $14.22 billion or 18.6 per cent of the portfolio.

In this quarter it appointed hedge fund managers Arrowgrass Capital Partners, Blackstone Alternative Asset Management and New York-based hedge fund Vermillion Asset Management.

Arrowgrass is a spin-off from Deutsche Bank and has a European focus, with a number of investment strategies including distressed investments and special situations.

It is unclear what investment strategies the Future Fund has sought from these managers but in its 2010 annual report, the fund said it was looking to diversify its hedge fund strategies beyond an initial focus on distressed and event-driven credit.

The Future Fund also listed in the report that its three largest sector exposures in alternatives were distressed and event driven strategies (38 per cent), multi-strategy/relative value (24 per cent) and macro directional (19 per cent).

Cash holdings have dipped below 10 per cent of the portfolio in the last quarter of the year, with the fund now holding 8.8 per cent of its assets in cash compared to 11 per cent at the end of the third quarter.

This continues a strategy of reducing cash holdings from the heights of 2009 when the fund’s cash holdings were as high as 41 per cent.

However the fund indicated in its 2010 annual report that it would maintain levels of cash sufficient to allow for opportunistic investments.

Since the June 30 2010 the fund has invested about 4.3 per cent of its cash into range of tangible and alternative assets.

The Future Fund’s board has previously expressed a desire to further diversify the fund’s holdings, particularly in private equity, infrastructure and property.

These asset classes ticked up by between 0.4 and 0.5 per cent during the last quarter of the year.

During the same period it cut back its exposure to developed market equities by 1.4 per cent and it now represents 21.3 per cent of the portfolio. It also marginally decreased its holdings of Australian equities which now represent 11.2 per cent of the portfolio.

All percentages are excluding the fund’s holdings in Australian telecommunications company Telstra.

Its Telstra portfolio, which it has been gradually selling down, returned 2.9 per cent for the year and 2.7 per cent for the quarter.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous