Future Fund goes defensive

Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, the Future Fund, has lost more than $2 billion in the September quarter, as global share markets tumbled – despite reducing its equity exposure and moving more into defensive assets, such as cash.

The latest quarterly results reveal the $73.18 billion fund lost 2.9 per cent, with chairman David Murray (pictured) citing a 13 per cent drop in the Australian share market and a 14 per cent fall in global equity markets during this period.

The fund lessened the potential impact of falling equity markets by reducing its exposure to equities and increasing its cash holdings from June 30.

Over the quarter, the fund sharply reduced its overseas developed-market equity holdings by 5.2 per cent to 16.1 per cent of the portfolio. The fund also marginally reduced its exposure to Australian equities and emerging market equities.

Cash holdings were increased by 2 per cent to 10.8 per cent of the portfolio.

The fund has also continued a gradual expansion of its alternative assets, which consist of hedge fund and hedge fund-of-fund investments.

Sponsored Content

The holdings of alternative assets have risen by 3 per cent from 18.6 per cent of the portfolio to 21.6 per cent.

In the fund’s annual report, tabled in Parliament last week, the fund states that it is diversifying its hedge fund strategy beyond the distressed credit investments it made in the midst of the financial crisis.

The hedge fund strategies have been expanded to include volatility- and commodity-focused managers with active management approaches.

As of June 30, the fund’s alternative investments were split as follows:

• 26 per cent in multi-strategy/relative value;

• 31 per cent in macro directional;

• 28 per cent in distressed and event-driven;

• 9 per cent in fundamental long/short; and

• 7 per cent in commodity-orientated.

The fund has also increased its private equity holdings from 3.9 per cent of the portfolio to 5 per cent.

While the fund took a hit in the September quarter, the sovereign wealth fund enjoyed its most successful annual result since it began investing in May 2006.

In its annual report, the fund reports a nominal return of 12.8 per cent for the year to June 30.

The board’s stated investment aim is to achieve a 4.5 to 5.5 per cent average real return over rolling 10-year periods.

This latest yearly result amounts to a real return of 9.2 per cent.

Since inception the fund has achieved an average nominal return of 5.2 per cent, resulting in a real return of around 2.2 per cent.

When the fund was formed, it was noted that it may initially fall behind its stated investment goals, as it rolled out its investment strategies.

In the annual report, Murray acknowledges the fund has initially underperformed its long-term investment targets, but expresses confidence in the fund’s investment strategy.

“While performance to date is below the long-term target, it demonstrates the quality of investment returns that the fund is capable of generating,” Murray says in his chairman’s report.

“During periods when many investors have suffered significant losses, the fund has been less affected. As markets have recovered the portfolio has generated positive returns.”

The fund lost 4.2 per cent in the year of the global financial crisis, but since then has achieved double-digit annual returns and exceeded its investment aims.

Under its mandate the fund must achieve its investment results with “acceptable but not excessive levels of risk”.

Murray says the fund expects to see the current uncertainty in financial markets continue as the global economy continues to undergo “significant structural adjustment over the years to come”.

In its annual report the board says that it expects modest, below-trend growth in a number of major developed countries as these countries tackle debt reduction.

The board is more positive about the outlook for emerging markets but sees continuing market volatility – and so is positioning the portfolio defensively.

“Elevated cash levels are held as a funding source for opportunities that we anticipate an uncertain future may present, and a defensive bias is embedded within the listed equities portfolio,” the report says.

In its annual report the fund also outlines its target asset allocation for the year ahead to June 30, 2012.

These allocations are listed below and contrasted with the current holdings at September 30.

FUTURE FUND: TARGET vs ACTUAL ASSET ALLOCATION

Target allocation* Actual portfolio**
Equity 39.0% 36.5%
Listed equity 32.5% 31.5%
Private equity 6.5% 5.0%
Tangible assets 15.0% 11.9%
Debt 16.0% 19.2%
Alternatives 20% 21.6%
Cash 10% 10.8%
 * June 30, 2012 ** September 30, 2011 
Source: Future Fund

 

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous