Future Fund chief departs, alternative weightings increase

Paul Costello

Four years after becoming its first employee, Paul Costello will leave his role as general manager of Australia’s Future Fund, saying “new leadership” was appropriate now that the A$87 billion ($81.2 billion) vehicle was beyond its “startup phase.”

In that time the fund, which began investing in June 2007, has moved to a highly diversified position that includes 15.6 per cent in alternatives – where skilled managers are used to take advantage of capital scarcity and market inefficiency through a diverse range of strategies – 4.5 per cent in infrastructure, and 3 per cent in private equity.

In the year to June 30, 2010 the fund has deployed more than 28 per cent of its cash, with alternatives and global equities the main beneficiaries. The alternatives allocation, for instance, has increased from 5 to 15.6 per cent in the past year.

Costello said he will remain in his role for another couple of months, to “facilitate a smooth transition” to a new leader of the Future Fund Management Agency, Melbourne.

The fund’s board of guardians said it already was searching for a replacement, and would look locally and offshore.

Board chairman David Murray paid tribute to Costello, particularly for his role in “recruiting a skilled team to develop and implement the investment program.”

Sponsored Content

From holding an initial $18 billion in a cash account, the fund under chief investment officer, David Neal, now has more than 60 partnerships with global investment managers.

David Murray, chair of the fund’s board of guardians, said cash was deployed into strategies “consistent with our long-term objective”.

Murray said the design of the portfolio meant the fund was less reliant on equity markets to generate returns, than other investors.

During the year the fund moved its debt program, which remains a significant part of the portfolio at 21.9 per cent, away from holdings built opportunistically during the early stages of the credit crisis, to longer-term and higher yielding securities.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous