Carbon is next bubble, warns report

Capital markets may be creating a so-called carbon bubble by mispricing known fossil fuel reserves as assets, leaving investors with a systematic risk to their portfolios, new research claims.

The research published by Carbon Tracker looks at the total known and listed fossil fuel reserves and compares them to what a possible global carbon budget would be if the world is to meet its current commitments to limit global warming.

It argues that the market is mispricing fossil fuel reserves because large amounts will be left “stranded” if the world economy is to move to a lower-carbon emitting model.

The report “Unburnable Carbon – Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon bubble?” also looked at the world’s stock markets and calculated that countries with the largest greenhouse gas potential in fossil fuel reserves on their stock exchanges were Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom.

The stock exchanges of London, Sao Paulo, Moscow, Australia and Toronto all have an estimated 20-30 per cent of their market capitalisation connected to fossil fuels, the report found.

The research takes as its starting point last year’s Cancun Agreement which saw an international commitment to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius.

Sponsored Content

Carbon tracker – an initiative which aims to work with capital market regulators and investors to assess systematic climate change risks – then builds into its own modelling research by the Potsdam Institute that calculated the carbon reduction necessary to not exceed this 2°C warming target.

The institute calculated that to reduce the chance of exceeding a 2°C warming by 20 per cent, the global carbon emission budget from 2000-2050 was 886 Gt CO2.

Carbon Tracker then looked at the world’s known fossil fuel reserves, which have a carbon potential of 2795 Gt CO2, and calculated that governments and global markets were currently treating these reserves as assets when in fact just 20 per cent could be burned if a 2°C target was to be achieved.

The report found these reserves were equivalent to nearly five times the carbon budget for the next 40 years.

“Currently financial markets have an unlimited capacity to treat fossil fuel reserves as assets,” report authors Mark Campanale and Jeremy Leggett write in their report.

“As governments move to control carbon emissions, this market failure is creating systematic risks for institutional investors, notably the threat of fossil fuel assets becoming stranded as the shift to a low-carbon economy accelerates.”

The report also analysed the fossil fuel reserves of the top 100 listed coal companies and the top 100 listed oil and gas companies and found their fossil fuel reserves alone represent 745 Gt CO2.

This is in excess of the 565 Gt CO2 the Potsdam Institute calculates as the remaining carbon budget for the next 40 years if the 2°C limit on global warming is likely to be achieved.

These coal and oil and gas companies represented $7.4 trillion in value as at February 2011, the report says.

The report notes that in addition to the reserves of established companies, new listings of fossil fuel companies as well as public listings of large state-owned energy companies in the developing world will further add substantially to listed fossil fuel reserves.

The report encourages investors to look at which stock markets they are exposed to that may have greater proportions of fossil fuel producing companies and would, therefore, be more prone to stranded assets.

Investors are also advised to examine if conventional indexes that are potentially fossil-fuel-heavy are the long-term performance benchmarks for their portfolios.

Finally, the report calls for investors to look at their asset allocation models to see if they are address risks associated with fossil fuel reserves and may be exposed to potentially stranded assets.

The full report can be viewed here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Giant Norwegian SWF sizes up active management

An external review is being carried out on behalf of one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, the NOK2.47 trillion ($405 billion) Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global, to determine whether active management should continue, with opinions sought from international experts in the UK and US. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalsTRS initiates active/passive review

CalSTRS staff will present to the investment committee the first of three reports on the optimal balance between active versus passive in its global equity and fixed income portfolios, a process that will culminate in recommendations for any structural changes in February next year. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

New York examines investment transactions for non-compliance

The Mercer Sentinel Group has completed a review of the New York Common Retirement Fund’s investment transactions approved by the State Comptroller over a two year period, concluding only one out of 112 transactions did not comply with written policies and procedures. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Eastern Promise: Why China’s only half the story

Kristen Paech talks to Michael Hanson-Lawson, CEO of East Capital Asia, about the new kid on the emerging markets block – Eastern Europe – and why pension funds should consider an allocation to the region, which has tripled nominal GDP over the past five years. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Fiduciaries and investors ‘divided’ over inflation

There is a fundamental disconnect emerging between fiduciaries, and their underlying ‘real’ investors, on whether deflation or inflation is the prevailing investment theme, according to political and policy consultant Pippa Malmgrem, who spoke with Michael Bailey about why the prevailing model of strategic asset allocation has to change. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

AP2, AP4 hail active management

Swedish buffer funds AP2 and AP4, have hailed active management as a major driver of profits in the first half of the year, at a time when the Government has challenged the value of active management and launched a review of the funds’ costs management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous