CalPERS’ new sec lending risk controls

CalPERS has made some significant changes to its securities lending policy document in order to reduce risk and improve counterparty diversification in the portfolio, including a reduction in the maximum exposure to any counterparty, from 30 to 25 per cent of the total program.

CalPERS also prohibited special investment vehicles in all forms from its securities lending program, and special purpose vehicles are now required to receive explicit permission from staff for purchase by external parties.

The fund has significantly reduced its external relationships, leading to more reliance on internal staff and more oversight of all investments. The internal staff also increased the amount of liquidity available to the fund by assigning daily, weekly and monthly liquidity targets.

The fund’s consultant, Wilshire, said while the revised changes to the policy decrease risks in the program, they do not protect CalPERS from the potential for any losses in the future, but would lessen the impact of an environment as severe as that experienced in the past two years.

In the past eight years CalPERS has auctioned off access to $835 billion in assets for securities lending through 33 separate auctions, with cumulative net earnings of $1.4 billion. For the year to the end of March 2009, the average market value of securities on loan for the year was $33.5 billion, with annualised earnings of 23 basis points.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Warren Buffett’s excellent adventure

'Youngster’ Warren Buffett (85) rebuffed risks from sugar and climate change as he toured the American economy with his ‘older’ offsider, Charlie Munger (92), presenting at the Berkshire Hathaway AGM .

Pay for performance

Pension fund executive pay varies widely around the globe, with differences based on internal management and alternatives exposures. Amanda White examines pension fund executive pay.

A long way to go

It’s all very well to have diversity, but most people lack the tools for how to get the best out of a diverse team. Instead the reverse is true and diversity can lead to an unlevel playing field.

Too much of a good thing

Experts at the Thinking Ahead Institute outline the pitfalls of implementing team diversity, , when too much diversity fails us, and how organisations can be champions for change.

Income the key dimension

Risk should be defined as the inability to meet retirement income goals, so investors and their managers should forget alpha and other “distractions”, according to David Booth.

Worlds colliding

The debate about the effect of pay inequality on both the financial and real-world markets is about to get a whole lot hotter this year.

Previous