AustralianSuper rethinks hedge funds

The A$28 billion ($25.5 billion) AustralianSuper, has reduced its allocation to hedge funds from 3.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent, as part of a process of analysing the sources of beta within the overall investment portfolio.

Chief investment officer of the fund, Mark Delaney, said many important implications about diversification had been revealed in the investigation of the beta sources in all portfolios.

“It’s encouraged us to think that we have to be very conscious of what are the implicit market risks in each of these asset classes and how they relate to each other in different circumstances to get a better understanding of their key drivers,” he said.

As a result of the financial crisis, Delaney said the fund had “found out that hedge funds are a mixture of equity and fixed income strategies, one thing they are not is absolute return vehicles”.

However, overall AustralianSuper is not against hedge funds, with Delaney citing them as another vehicle for investment skill.

Sponsored Content

“We think there are people out there who are really good investors, but our decision will be made on how skilful they are rather than which strategies they run.”

However the fund is unlikely set up a hedge fund program and find funds to fill it, rather each investment, and manager will be assessed on its own merit.

When the sub-prime crisis hit, the fund directed all its inflows into cash, in April this year it started investing inflows again.

The market value of the fund’s assets invested in absolute return funds was just over $1 billion at June 2008, and the same time a year later it was half of that. It reduced the number of managers from nine to six, with funds managers FRM and Aurora losing mandates.

The funds have been re-allocated to global and domestic equities.

The fund made a radical move earlier in the year to reduce the exposure to active management within its domestic equities to half of the portfolio, which saw nearly two thirds of funds managers lose mandates.

Asset Owner:AustralianSuper

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous