Australian Future Fund favours hedge funds

The A$66 billion ($58.8 billion) Australian Future Fund has tapped its cash portfolio to increase its exposure to alternatives, with cash dropping from 46 to 15 per cent in the past year, including an estimated allocation of $3.7 billion to three hedge fund managers in the fourth quarter of last year.

In the past year the fund has moved from a 46 per cent cash allocation to about 15 per cent, with alternatives increasing over the time period from 3.7 to 11.4 per cent.

Developed market equities and debt securities have also been beneficiaries of the cash allocations in the past year.

Chair of the Future Fund Board of Guardians, David Murrary, said significant progress had been made in transitioning the portfolio towards the long-term asset allocation.

In the final quarter of 2009, the fund, a bellwether for many large super funds in the region, has allocated an estimated $3.7 billion to three hedge fund managers, plus an unspecified amount to three other managers.

Sponsored Content

The three new hedge fund managers are Och Ziff, a US-based multi-strategy manager, BlackRock Alternative Advisors, which has various hedge fund strategies managed from several countries, including the former Quellos Capital Management, and Brevan Howard, a UK-based alternatives manager.

The other new managers are: Macquarie Investment Management for Australian equities; and M&G Investment Management and Vianova Asset Management (a boutique backed by Australian Unity), both for debt securities.

The new hedge fund managers have taken the allocation to alternatives from $2.4 billion to $6.2 billion during the December quarter.

The Future Fund now has mandates with 10 alternatives managers and 58 managers overall.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous