The “CalPERS effect” on targeted company share prices

CalPERS’ approach to improving portfolio returns by engaging management of poorly performing companies to rethink governance and strategy has had a substantial endorsement, with analysis by Wilshire Associates demonstrating that the fund has had a dramatic effect on the performance of the companies placed on its Focus List.

Wilshire measured the performance of 139 companies placed on the focus list, which targets publicly listed companies chosen for their poor performance and governance, between 1987 and 2007.

Relative performance was measured by examining the total return for targeted companies for the five years preceding the “initiative date” and the total return for these same companies for the subsequent five years.

For the first five years prior to the initiative date the focus list companies produced returns that averaged 84.2 per cent below their respective benchmarks on a cumulative basis, which is equivalent to an excess return of -30.9 per cent on an annualised basis. For the first five years after the date, the average targeted company produced excess returns of 15.4 per cent above their benchmarks, or about 3 per cent on an annualised basis.

“The data strongly shows that CalPERS’ involvement has generally stopped the rapid erosion of performance results,” the report says. “Wilshire’s examination shows that CalPERS’ good governance campaign has added value to the share prices of targeted companies.”

Sponsored Content

The analysis, presented to the investment committee this week, goes on to conclude that the CalPERS’ approach to improving portfolio returns by engaging management of poorly performing companies to rethink governance and strategy continues to work.

Further, the report shows that the expanded corporate governance resources and program undertaken by the fund in the past seven years, has had an effect on performance. The companies targeted in the past 10 years have on average, produced cumulative excess returns of 37.4 per cent in the five years post initiative date versus 15.4 per cent for the total composite focus funds.

Wilshire’s analysis concludes that resources spent on identifying and rectifying corporate assets that are poorly managed, can create substantial opportunity and premium returns for active shareholders.

“CalPERS has been an active corporate governance investor for many years and the continued success of the Focus List is proof that good corporate goverance can improve shareholder returns.”

In measuring the CalPERS’ effect, the report also considers other influences on stock prices such as management changes, scandals, and new business. It also considers that the methodology used to select companies on the Focus List has changed over time.

Leave a Comment

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Why NYC pensions CIO hasn’t drunk the ‘TPA Kool-Aid’

Three decades of investing have given Monte Tarbox sharp eyes for recognising risk and opportunities, and he’s putting it to use as the new permanent chief investment officer of the $306 billion NYC Bureau of Asset Management. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, Tarbox outlines his vision for the fund, why he’s bullish on infrastructure but “nervous” on PE, and why he hasn’t drunk the TPA “Kool-Aid”.

Sort content by

Mubadala taps foreign expertise for new return sources

Setting its commercial finance joint venture with General Electric (GE) in stone last Sunday, the US$14.7 billion Mubadala Development of Abu Dhabi furthered its drive into investments designed to boost its home economy through knowledge transfer, from resources exploration and production and education, to the ultimate commodity hedge: a sustainable city founded in the desert.

PME’s path to recovery

PME, the €18.8 billion (US$25.6 billion) industry-wide pension fund for the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in the Netherlands, has seen its funding ratio fall 45 per cent over the last year. Kristen Paech talks to the fund about its recovery plan, including the decision not to rebalance equities, and the benefits of using a

CIC creates new investment teams, scouts opportunities offshore

As global markets nosedived and its initial investments soured, the China Investment Corporation (CIC) took the opportunity to reorganise its investment operations and focus on less risky investments at home and in Asia. Simon Mumme reports. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Equity bias thwarts Irish sovereign fund’s returns

Ireland’s €15.5 billion (US$20.6 billion) sovereign wealth fund, the National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF), has been highly exposed to the equity market malaise. Kristen Paech examines the fund’s investment strategy and the Government’s recent decision to use the NPRF to finance the recapitalisation of two of Ireland’s beleaguered banks. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

More in-house management means lower costs, risks for Finnish fund Ilmarinen

The 21.7 billion (US$28.7 billion) Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company is adopting a ‘back to basic’ approach to investment and relying on its internal investment team to steer it through unprecedented equity market volatility. Deputy chief executive, Timo Ritakallio, talks to Kristen Paech about the virtues of in-house management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UniSuper’s proprietary risk program challenges investment assumptions

UniSuper, the $23 billion Australian pension fund for those working in higher education and research, has developed an in-house risk budgeting and factor analysis program that monitors the extent to which the fund deviates from its strategic asset allocation, and ensure the fund’s active risk is allocated appropriately between managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2