US funds look for more protection offshore

The trend away from US equities and various fixed interest products as interest rates risks increase is expected to continue, according to the latest Global Asset Flows Review from eVestment Alliance and Casey Quirk.

The review covering figures for the fourth quarter of last year shows a pick-up in flows starting around mid-year. However the total inflow of $204 billion from US-based institutional investors during the quarter remains well below the quarterly peak of $759 billion set in 2006.

The review shows that non-US equity products were the biggest beneficiaries of incoming flows last year, increasing their total assets by 3.2 per cent. This was a dramatic reversal from the flight to safety experienced from late 2008 when investors sought protection in fixed income products, particularly in the US.

The review says: “With interest rates at a cyclical low within the developed economies around the world, investors will continue to seek short duration and inflation-indexed fixed income products. Moreover, to minimise interest rate risk and maximise diversification, the trend towards non-US equity products will continue as investors seek emerging and developed markets believed to have decoupled from the US economy.”

The researchers say that large and stable fund managers will receive the bulk of the inflows as long as confidence in the recovery remains low.

Sponsored Content

The world’s largest bond manager – PIMCO – for instance was a massive beneficiary of the flight to quality up until mid-2009.

According to the review, the firm, based in Newport CA, was number one for inflows in both global and US fixed interest funds for 2009, which are the two largest categories. The $160 billion into PIMCO’s US fixed interest funds was more than four times as much as that gathered by the second-placed BlackRock.

Generally speaking, more aggressive investment styles suffered losses in flows, while index products grew by about 12 per cent over the year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous