State Street goes uber-global

After one year in the job, State Street’s boss, Jay Hooley (pictured), surveys the post-crisis landscape and looks at the trends for investors and fund managers. He spoke with Greg Bright.

State Street, the Boston-based global bank and fund manager, is aiming to have more than half its revenue coming from non-US sources within five years, with Asia Pacific growth expected to figure prominently.

That implies a “heady” annual revenue growth rate in the mid-teens, compound, to lift the non-US share of total revenue from its current level of about 40 per cent, according to Hooley.

Hooley, State Street’s chairman, president and chief executive, took over the firm’s top job on March 1 last year, after several years of running the global services division. He believes his company has positioned itself well after the storm.

“We’re well-positioned in a financial sense,” he says. “We are one of the best-capitalised financial institutions. We’re also well-positioned in a strategic sense.”

State Street is expecting a continuation of the trend among big pension funds to employ a range of beta strategies coupled with an increasing use of alternatives, rather than a traditional active core approach for broad market equities and bonds.

Sponsored Content

“That portends well for us,” Hooley says.

State Street’s funds management arm, State Street Global Advisors (SSgA), is a quantitative manager with strong links to academia. It not only has one of the world’s largest cap-weighted index portfolios but also offers index-like strategies with various “active” tilts. At the other end of the spectrum it offers hedge fund-like long/short strategies.

Like other quant managers, the firm was an early sufferer in the global crisis. In August 2007 most quant managers, including SSgA, suffered a sharp fall in performance due to a combination of factors coming together under a weight of too much money. Since then, the quants have adapted their models and conditions have changed significantly such that performance has largely returned.

Hooley says: “We had a 100-year storm that no-one predicted. We went through a difficult cycle and we’ll be smarter for it. We’re comfortable in our space.”

He points out, however, that the firm will continue to look selectively for different styles of funds management to introduce to its range according to client demand.

It has recently concluded the acquisition, for instance, of Bank of Ireland’s global funds management arm, which is a traditional active manager.

Hooley says that pension fund trustees and management are increasingly looking for more comprehensive solutions, bringing together multiple strategies to produce an outcome. This is also a trend which suits State Street.

The firm’s State Street Associates academic team and Advanced Research Centre allow it to design models to produce optimum outcomes given certain risk tolerances, he says. The trends for lifestyle funds and liability driven investments in the US are driving demand in this regard.

While funds management may continue to be fragmented with demand for alternatives and capacity-constrained strategies, Hooley believes the asset servicing sector, including core custody, may see some further consolidation.

Currently, the big four custodian banks have about 70 per cent of the asset servicing market globally. Not only are regulators around the world looking at the banks for capital adequacy and other signs of weakness, but also many of the banks themselves are looking at their portfolio of businesses to see where they can best compete.

“It’s a scale business which requires continuous investment in IT and systems,” Hooley says. “We’ve never stopped spending 20-25 per cent (of revenue) each year throughout the cycle.”

That equates to more than $1 billion a year. Recent spending has had a focus on “cloud” computing, which offers not only cost savings but also much greater speed to market and innovation around data.

State Street has built its own private “cloud” rather than use a public one such as Google’s.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous