Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region.

Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation in the UK water industry, where industry regulator Ofwat was proposing modifications to licences which would allow for changes in pricing controls.

“We have been attracted to the water industry in the UK because of its outstanding history of regulation, and we have been prepared to fund a share of the billions of pounds of investment the sector needs,” Arndt told the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) conference in Sydney.

“But we are very concerned about Oftwat’s approach, and think it is hard to understand why they would take that approach rather than working with the industry on an agreed path to any changes.”

Arndt said he hoped the UK Government would “move swiftly and categorically to correct the position.”

“The Government should reinforce the water industry’s standing as a destination for foreign infrastructure investment,” he said.

Sponsored Content

The Future Fund has $4.7 billion or 5.9 per cent of its assets in infrastructure, an allocation it has built up over the past five years. $2 billion of that is invested in Australia, and around $1 billion in the UK, largely in transport assets such as Gatwick Airport.

“Unfortunately there have been a number of issues in the UK which have given us cause for concern, or at least reasons to pause for thought,” said Arndt.

“For example we have had the imposition of the largest air passenger tax in the world, without any consultation with the industry whatsoever.

“The unclear policies around airport development in the south of England makes it very difficult to investment further capital at this time.”

Arndt was speaking at an ASFA forum on infrastructure investment which was also addressed by the British high commissioner to Australia, Paul Madden.

The high commissioner said the UK welcomed infrastructure investment from Australian institutional investors, and said the December release of the PFI review would chart a clear way forward for the sector.

The UK, he said, had a pipeline of 500 public and private infrastructure projects worth over £ 250 billion.

In a bid to draw more investment from pension funds, the UK Government will launch its new Pension Infrastructure Platform (PIP) will launch as a fund in January 2013, targeting £2 billion ($3.24 billion) worth of projects with the backing of around 10 UK pension funds. Madden said 750 million pounds had so far been committed.

The drive is being led by a trio comprising the UK Treasury, the £11-billion Pension Protection Fund (PPF), protector of 12 million members paying out on schemes employers fail to meet, and the National Association of Pension Funds (NAPF), which counts 1200 pension funds as members, with a combined $1.295 trillion in assets.

 

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous