More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs.

Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper finds that these economies of scale are solely driven by management costs.

Using a unique dataset of 225 Dutch occupational pension funds with a total of €928 billion of assets under management, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the relation between investment costs and pension fund size.

The dataset is free from self-reporting biases and decomposes investment costs for six asset classes in management costs and performance fees.

The key finding of the paper is that a pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management, has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs.

Moreover, the effect disappears when asset allocation is not controlled for, indicating that larger pension funds invest relatively more in asset classes with higher investment costs.

Sponsored Content

Economies of scale do, however, differ per asset class.

“We find significant economies of scale in fixed income, equity and commodity portfolios, but not in real estate investments, private equity and hedge funds,” the authors say. “We also find that large pension funds pay significantly higher performance fees for equity, private equity and hedge fund investments.

“We find that performance fees significantly impact investment costs for equities, private equity and hedge funds. For these asset classes, we find that a tenfold increase in size raises performance fees by 0.74, 41.49 and 33.36 basis points respectively.”

The paper looks at the decomposition of investment costs into management costs and performance fees for six separate asset classes: equity, fixed income, real estate, commodities, private equity and hedge funds.

 

To access the full paper click below

Scale economies in pension fund investments – a dissection of investment costs across asset classes 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous