Fund collaboration first step to joint investment

European pension fund service providers PGGM and PKA have agreed on an innovative knowledge exchange that eventually aims to look for joint investment opportunities as well as improving the way the funds conduct risk management and the benchmarking of investments, costs and socially responsible investing.

Martin van Rijn, chief executive officer for Dutch pension fund service provider, PGGM, says that while the knowledge exchange is in its infancy, both organisations aim to be catalysts for greater research and improved investment approaches.

In a statement to Top1000funds.com van Rijn lists the areas of cooperation as:

  • Deepening of research and fact finding on risk management
  • Creating joint venture investment opportunities and benchmark selection
  • Sharing and benchmarking of socially responsible investment (SRI) methodology
  • Benchmarking of costs and cost transparency
  • Developing of common projects on membership involvement.

The knowledge exchange is the first of its kind for PGGM, but van Rijn says that cooperation with other potential partners is a realistic possibility.

“PGGM is always interested in cooperating with compatible partners,” he says.

“When a pension fund service provider has the same goals, profile, core values and operates in a similar market, we would be interested to explore the possibilities.”

Sponsored Content

 

Synergies say it all

Van Rijn explains that the two organisations have a number of synergies, which include a strong consideration of social, environmental and corporate governance (ESG) factors in their investments.

PKA and PGGM are signatories to the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) and screen investments based on pre-established ethical principles.

When it comes to their investments, the funds also both invest in DONG Energy, a Danish company with interests in offshore oil extraction and renewable energy.

Both organisations invest on behalf of several pension funds with participants in the health and social sector in their respective countries.

PGGM manages, on behalf of six pension funds, around €115 billion ($151.6 billion) in pension assets for 2.5 million people. The Dutch pension fund service provider offers pension management, integrated asset management, management support and policy advice to its institutional customers.

PKA is a joint administration company for five Danish pension funds and has $27.7 billion in assets under management on behalf of 250,000 members of the health care and social sectors. Along with managing investments for the funds, PKA handles administration.

PGGM oversees – like PKA – a hybrid defined contribution/defined benefit scheme.

PKA manages investments according to the particular strategies decided by each of the five pension funds – even though they are similar and their asset allocations alike.

 

Responsible action

As part of integrating socially responsible investment principles into its investment strategies, PKA uses British ESG research EIRIS as part of all investments and Hermes EOS for the ongoing engagement activities.

Also conducting engagements itself, PGGM has in recent years expanded its SRI team, and since 2001 has used UK asset manager F&C Investments to complement its in-house activities. These include what it describes as “structural, systematic and visible dialogue with the financial markets and the individual companies” the organisation invests in.

As part of its responsible investment program it has also sought collaboration with other investors, including a recent working group on agriculture investment.

In conjunction with this collaborative work, PGGM has published a position paper outlining its approach to investing in agriculture, including an explanation of its investments in agricultural commodities.

Asset Owner:PGGM / PFZW

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous