How the Future Fund found agility

Using a fund of funds enabled the Future Fund to build a large exposure to hedge funds quickly during the global financial crisis, chief investment officer of the Future Fund, David Neal says.

The Future Fund, which uses a combination of fund of funds and direct hedge fund investments, decided it did not have the breadth of skill and research to entirely invest directly.

“Could we realistically, or want to, try to build a team with enough talent and size to cover the industry? It’s not consistent with our notion to keep the investment team small enough to sit around a table and talk about all of the opportunities and strategies to build our portfolio,” Neal says.

“We thought with fund of funds, and the extra edge of someone who’s actually doing it, was worth exploring. As we started, we found other benefits of fund of funds, for example, in the crisis we were able to move quickly. We had one investment-management agreement with one organisation, which has relationships, and we can throw money at them quickly and could build a large exposure quickly. There was an execution service that came from it that would have taken a long time.”

Environment-specific risk

Neal says the Future Fund, which has almost 20 per cent exposure to hedge funds, is looking to expand its exposure and invest in commodities, catastrophe bonds and macro managers.

Sponsored Content

The fund has generated 4.9 per cent since inception, well below its mandate of consumer-price index plus 4.5 to 5.5 per cent

“We are clearly behind, but we don’t think there is much more we could have done. It is very dangerous to play catch-up. If you load up more risk, you’ll blow it,” Neal says. “You have to take the right amount of risk given the environment.”

Investors must manage the risk profile to the prevailing landscape, Neal says, but he believes there will be opportunity to take more risk in the next decade.

Meritocracy for assets

The Future Fund has a “dynamic” allocation process, but it is not relative to a benchmark. Rather, all investment opportunities are assessed on their merit.

“Long-term characteristics can change quickly, the GFC showed that,” he says. “It is not about active tilting but managing risk/return and adjusting accordingly.”

Because of this dynamic nature, the funds are shifted from one opportunity to another.

“There are managers we are happy with who we take money from because the opportunity changes,” Neal says.

The Future Fund considers every investment opportunity on a hedged basis, so each investment can be compared on a like-for-like basis. The fund then decides how much currency to hold.

At the moment it has 12.5 per cent in emerging-market currencies and 18 per cent in developed-market currencies

“Currency is the risk I worry about the most – or it is the cause and solution of the risk I worry about the most – liquidity.”

Neal sits on the Hedge Fund Standards Board and encourages investors to sign the standards’ investor chapter.

“The more investors that sign, the more that managers are interested.”

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous