Euro funds think global as risk appetite returns

Investment appetite among European institutions rebounded in 2009, with Mercer Investment Consulting identifying a surge in clients’ demands for new global fixed income, global equity and specialist credit exposures. Andy Barber, global head of manager research at Mercer, tells Simon Mumme about the investment themes driving these searches, and the evident decline of the ‘home country bias’ among UK institutions.


Manager search activity stalled in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009, but as listed markets rallied, investors stopped “sitting on their hands” and pursued some of the opportunities caused by the market collapse, Andy Barber, global head of manager research at Mercer, said.

Mercer ran 161 searches in the nine months to September 2009, compared to 189 in the whole of 2008 and 226 in 2006.

“This year it will be more than 240 in total,” Barber said.

Most of these searches targeted global fixed income, global equity and opportunistic credit managers. The institutions commissioned Mercer to carry out 61 searches for global fixed income, 52 for global equity, 40 for buy-and-hold credit and 15 for buy-and-hold convertibles strategies.

The provisional search numbers also confirmed the weakening ‘home country bias’ among UK institutions, as they steadily reduce their exposure to domestic equities and sign more global equity mandates.

Sponsored Content

In 2005, the consultant conducted 42 searches for both domestic and global equity managers. But in subsequent years clients demanded more global searches and, in 2008, sent Mercer on 48 global equity searches and 17 domestic searches. In the first nine months of 2009, Mercer performed 38 global searches, and six in the UK.

This diminishing home market bias was not occurring in continental Europe, but was “currently a UK phenomenon,” Barber said.

“At the turn of the century, funds might have had a 70/30 split between UK and offshore equities. Now there is more offshore than domestic.”

He said the trend was being driven by institutions’ diversification into alternative assets, which cut back their overall equity exposures, and the diversification provided by global equity mandates.

This was not because the UK market was “structurally disadvantaged” in comparison to the global market. But it is more concentrated: its top 10 stocks – among them HSBC, Shell, BP, GlaxoSmithKline and Rio Tinto -Â account for 41.7 per cent of the index.

Within global equity allocations, institutions targeted some exposure to emerging markets. While Mercer has not published a house view of emerging markets, Barber said some clients have oriented portfolios towards emerging markets.

“There are others who prefer to leave it to fund managers. But when people have global briefs, most managers have a positive view of emerging markets.”

 In 2008, Mercer promoted short-dated global credit and convertibles strategies as attractive opportunities. Now it is focusing on investment grade government debt in emerging markets, denominated in local currencies.

“We’re looking at a basket of countries, rather than country-specific, and assume it to be more the BRICs than Eastern Europe.

“If you look at the finances of some of these places and compare it to the developed world, they offer very high yields, and seem to be a little bit more solvent.”

Barber said this theme could also include the investment grade debt of emerging market corporations.

Somewhat surprisingly, few institutions took the opportunity to access hedge funds that were no longer at full capacity, given the widespread redemptions these managers incurred in 2008. In the UK, searches for alternatives managers dropped from 35 to 21; in Europe, the search tally fell from 17 to seven.

However, Barber expected investments in most non-traditional strategies to grow in coming years, as institutions aimed to become less reliant on equity market beta for performance.

But this shift would be made with frequent recourse to opportunities in the equity market.

“Do you really want to be detatched from equity market beta when equities are still not particularly expensive, and go into expensive alternatives?” Barber asked.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous