China a mystery going at breakneck speed

It’s not until you’re on the ground that the basic growth story in China is really obvious. When Guy Russo, now head of Kmart in Australia, was the head of McDonald’s in China, they called it “opening a store every four hours”.

Russo, who is now chairman of a charity for Chinese orphans, Half the Sky, says the basic growth of China is juxtaposed against the innovation-driven economy of the US.

“God knows when innovation will be needed in China,” he says.

The differences between the US and China are many. Spending culture versus savings culture; growth driven by innovation versus population. Arguably the biggest difference may be the willingness, or not, of US business and politics, to adapt.

Everywhere you go in China you hear about how the west does not “understand” China, Chinese business, or investment.

The willingness of the US and other developed nations, to adapt their ways of doing business, could be the key to whether they will benefit from the growth of China.

Sponsored Content

By way of example, Russo says the McDonald’s that opened in Tiananmen Square was the largest volume McDonald’s anywhere in the world.

“Soon after opening, the Chinese told us to move,” Russo says. “Our advice was we had legal rights to be there, and we had support from the US to fight that request. But thank God we backed down. We wouldn’t be operating in China now if we hadn’t.”

And in hindsight, he says, the store was in the wrong place anyway.

“It would be like opening a store in Washington right in front of the White House,” he says.

Certainly Chinese investors seem willing to adapt and learn from the west. Most executives I came across had PhDs from American universities. Investors wanted to hire western asset management firms to learn their way of thinking about and implementing investment strategies. And CIC managing director, Hua Fan, says education of the board is one of the top priorities in their currency management program.

The importance of the west “getting” China cannot be underestimated.

As head of portfolio advisory for the Asia Pacific at Towers Watson, Peter Ryan-Kane says “there is so much riding on China”.

Any broker, economic or industry report that you read, regardless of the industry, says that growth relies on China, he says.

“There is an enormous amount of emphasis on something being successful when we don’t know all the levers and how they’re being pulled,” he says.

“Will it be the next Japan?”

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous