AustralianSuper aims for beta returns after big cuts to active equities

The A$28billion (US$20 billion) AustralianSuper terminated several mandates with active equities managers last week and directed most of the freed-up capital to passive exposures bringing its passive management in equities to more than 50 per cent, in an effort to simplify its portfolio by trimming excess managers.

The cuts accounted for approximately 25 per cent of AustralianSuper’s total equity portfolio, and were made to reduce overlap and duplication among managers that did not substantially improve performance, chief investment officer of AustralianSuper, Mark Delaney, said.

“We had a long tail of managers with small mandates in the portfolio, and thought that these weren’t big enough to materially impact the portfolio,” Delaney said.

“We had too large a list of managers for their ability to impact on the portfolio and add value.”

Delaney would not confirm the amount of money involved, but it is understood that 20 out of 30 mandates with active equity managers may have been culled.

Sponsored Content

The cuts impacted small-cap, mid-cap and large-cap managers.

While the remaining active managers welcomed bigger mandates as capital was redistributed, the real beneficiaries were passive managers like State Street Global Advisors, who enjoyed a flood of new money.

Delaney said that 50 per cent of the fund’s exposure to equities was now achieved through passive managers – up from 25 per cent – and that this exposure was unlikely to be managed internally now or in the future.

He said the shift towards beta would not limit the fund’s ability to benefit from active opportunities expected to be among the ruins of the bear market.

“We’ve still got a hefty component [of active managers and continue to manage it dynamically.”

Even though the boost to passive managers had reduced risk across the equities portfolios, the fund had not reallocated this risk.

“Resources, risk budget, fees: now that we have less mandates to monitor it gives us the scope to be more active elsewhere,” Delaney said.

Delaney emphasised that the terminations were made to simplify the portfolio and did not reflect the performance of the affected managers.

“No manager has been terminated for poor performance – it’s more to do with portfolio considerations.”

He said the accrual of excess managers began when AustralianSuper was formed in 2006 by the merger between the Superannuation Trust of Australia and Australian Retirement Fund, and the new entity absorbed most of its predecessors’ active equity mandates.

AustralianSuper added to this number in subsequent years and gradually built “an unwieldy list” that prompted the fund and its consultants to review the portfolio.

This culminated in written communication to managers last week informing them that their mandates were being withdrawn.

Asset Owner:AustralianSuper

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous