Adding value through risk allocations

2013 was a great year to add value by using risk to assign asset allocation, according to chief investment officer of Windham Capital, Lucas Turton, whose fund added 300 basis points above benchmark last year by dynamically allocating according to risk.

 

Windham Capital Management’s style is to focus on measuring and understanding risk to then make dynamic top down asset allocation decisions.

“We use risk in assigning asset allocation, 2013 was a good year to do that, it worked for us, we generated alpha,” says chief investment officer Lucas Turton.

Depending on risk, and the health of markets, rather than economic or bottom up analysis means the allocation of assets is often contrarian.

The fund began last year aggressively allocated despite the fiscal cliff and government shut down in the US.

Sponsored Content

“This is because markets weren’t responding to this situation, but the news had investors cautious. It was contrarian to be aggressive,” he says.

In March and April interest rates were beginning to behave and real estate was converging on bonds, which was identified as more of a regime shift, so a reduction in risk ensued.

“We are not basing our investment decisions on the Fed or geopolitical activity but when markets are susceptible,” Turton says.

About half the time last year, the Windham portfolio was contrarian, and the other half it was in line with markets.

“In the middle of year there was greater consensus markets were becoming more risky. And we reduced risk twice in the middle of the year.”

However what remained contrarian was the degree to which the portfolio reduced risk, with a 30 per cent decrease in growth assets.

“The magnitude was contrarian,” Turton says.

The fund has constraints of about 30 per cent either side of a benchmark allocation, allowing significant shifts and value to be added through better asset allocation.

The benchmark portfolio is a globally diversified passively managed mix of global equities, fixed income, commodities and real estate.

Windham, which was founded by MIT professor Mark Kritzman, uses proprietary measures to look at the global market risk environment, recognise when it changes and position portfolios to take advantage of the conditions.

“What we’ve been trying to determine is where any view matters too much to investors. We don’t think valuations such as P:E ratios impact returns, something that looks inexpensive can become cheaper. We want to look at risk.”

So far this year Turton believes there has been a modest uptick in measures of risk, but that generally markets are calm.

“It has risen this year and is approaching the level of April last year but it’s nowhere near 2011. We have seen a sell-off in an orderly fashion where correlations were low, it’s a traditional pull back after very strong market,” he says.

The outlook in the near term is that risk is low, so Windham is allocating to a diverse set of risky assets, with commodities and US REITs both big diversifiers in the portfolio, and allocations to foreign assets increasing.

“Clients are concerned with alpha and downside protection. We believe short term returns are difficult to predict but risk is somewhat predicable and can add value,” Turton says. “We are correctly anticipating the direction of risk.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Holland’s hybrid: defined ambition

Jan Tamerus, actuary director at PGGM, was instrumental in developing the new Dutch pension defined-ambition structure. Back in 2006, he was involved in looking at the sustainability of the defined benefit system and in concluding it was not in fact sustainable, the idea of defined ambition evolved. One of the key reasons for not going

Previous