A new card for an old infrastructure hand

 

 

 

With more than $A5 billion ($5.3 billion) invested in infrastructure through some 120 different types of assets, AustralianSuper is examining whether diversity is all its cracked up to be when it comes to infrastructure investing.

Sponsored Content

The $45-billion fund has ambitious plans to double both its infrastructure holdings and its size of its overall portfolio in five years.

As it looks to potential investments today, AustralianSuper’s head of infrastructure, Jason Peasley, explains that the investment team is looking for opportunities that will provide meaningful scale for what could be a much bigger sized fund down the track.

“Infrastructure involves active management. It is not just a beta play – there are alpha opportunities as well,” Peasley says.

If we are too diversified we risk having a portfolio that will do just the median; it is just going to be a beta return. The way our managers are structured, the fees we pay, we do expect opportunities to generate some alpha and our value add is valuing the managers and opportunities that will give that, given a certain risk profile… We should probably look at concentrating our portfolio a little more than diversifying further.”

New capital will drive increasing allocations and Peasley says that the fund is looking to invest directly in infrastructure.

According to Peasley, the “lion’s share” of the $5.3 billion invested in infrastructure is in 20 key assets, with the remaining 100 assets a “long tail” of smaller investments.

Direct investment would give the fund the flexibility and scale it needs to shape a portfolio that both complements its current holdings and also provides other avenues to market, allowing it to grow quickly.

“We see a strong role for more direct investment methods in our arsenal and we think they will compliment our existing platform and existing core managers quite well.”

AustralianSuper’s has the most infrastructure assets under management with managers Industry Funds Management (IFM) and Hastings Funds Management.

Its biggest investment is in Pacific Hydro, a company that has renewable energy projects in Brazil, Chile and Australia and makes up 13.53 per cent of AustralianSuper’s infrastructure portfolio.

AustralianSuper also has more than 18 per cent of its infrastructure investments in the growth asset of airports located in the Australian cities of Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.

Asset Owner:AustralianSuper

Leave a Comment

COAERS finds rich pickings in PE secondaries; warns of retail risk

COAERS finds rich pickings in PE secondaries; warns of retail risk

The exit drought and extended holding periods in private equity is causing mounting pain for many LPs. But for Austin-based COAERS, it is providing ample market to pick up bargains in the secondary market. Sarah Rundell spoke to CIO David Kushner.

Sort content by

Infra models under the spotlight

A nuanced environment for modelling cash flows and discount rates in infrastructure comes at a time when pension funds globally are looking to invest more heavily in the asset class. So what should investors be looking out for?

APG, NPS collaborate on private assets

Two of the world’s largest pension funds, the $626 billion Dutch APG and the $660 billion National Pension Service of South Korea (NPS), have joined forces in a partnership to invest in private assets including infrastructure and private real estate.

Back VC to solve inequalities: Ming

Pension funds around the globe should be putting their high-risk capital towards supporting venture funds that have a track record of seeing value in people, according to Vivienne Ming, Silicon Valley technologist, entrepreneur and theoretical neuroscientist. Ming believes that AI can be used to solve poverty, mental health, inequality and even predict who will spread COVID-19. She says technology can make all of our lives better.

A more thoughtful private equity model

Responsible investors need to take into account how fund management and investment structures may be exacerbating wealth and income disparities, as well as systemic market risk. Raphaele Chappe and Delilah Rothenberg from the Predistribution Initiative have some suggestions for how PE could be adjusted in this regard and how building back better post-COVID-19 requires a more thoughtful model.

Has your value definition just expired?

Is book-to-price still a suitable definition of the value factor? Researchers at Scientific Beta explore the arguments for different definitions including how to account for intangible capital.

Braving the unknown: high yield debt

Option-adjusted spreads for US high yield are above 700 basis points, a stress event threshold only breached four other times in the last two decades.  Mercer's Nathan Struemph examines the considerations for investors looking at these investments including the range of return outcomes in prior stress events, the path investors had to experience in reaching those outcomes, and the impact of implementation timeliness on returns.

Previous