Letter to the editor

Keith Ambachtsheer responds to an article on the negotiations by CalSTRS’ outgoing chief executive, Jack Ehnes, to achieve fully funded status by 2046.

Dear Amanda,

I was surprised to see the recent article titled “CalSTRS’ CEO achieved fully-funded status”.

In fact, CalSTRS’ own 2020 funding report states that its DB plan is only 70 per cent funded using an aggressive 7 per cent liability discount rate. The funded ratio would drop to 55 per cent if a more realistic 5 per cent discount rate were used. In comparison, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan reported an almost double 103 per cent funded ratio with a 5 per cent liability discount rate at the end of 2020.

It is true that CalSTRS reached agreement in 2014 with California employers and the State to target 100 per cent funded status for the DB plan by 2046 by making additional contributions.

While this agreement clearly represents progress, its importance is easily overstated for two reasons.

Sponsored Content

The first is the assumption that fund assets (including the additional contributions) will earn an aggressive net investment return of 7 per cent per year over the next 25 years.

The second is that the agreement will actually stay in place that long. While this is not impossible, many things can happen over a 25 year period, including in the State of California. For example, a recent CalSTRS review document noted that California employers and the State are looking for COVID-related relief from making additional CalSTRS contributions.

Despite this problem and possible future ones, the CalSTRS report noted somewhat hopefully “we still expect to make progress towards full funding”. However, its authors clearly recognise there can be material gaps between hope and subsequent reality.

I thought your readers might appreciate this additional information on CalSTRS’ funded status.

Yours truly,

Keith Ambachtsheer

Director Emeritus, International Centre for Pension Management, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto and President, KPA Advisory Services Ltd.

 

Leave a Comment

What I took away from the world’s ‘festival of private capital’

What I took away from the world’s ‘festival of private capital’

The on- and off-stage antics at the extravagant Milken Global Conference in Los Angeles tell us a lot about where institutional capital is right on the money – and where it is putting its head in the sand.

Sort content by

Back to the future: investors concerns in 2008 resonate today

This issue marks the 400th edition of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com,  which looks at the strategies and views of the world’s largest asset owners. So what were the concerns and opportunities of investors six years ago, and what are they now?   Since its launch in 2008, the journalists at conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com have written more than 2,000 stories on

Equity risk expectations – a response to short-termism

Solving short-termism is being held up by the institutional investment industry as some sort of performance saviour. There have been many attempts at uncovering the problems of, and offering solutions to, short-termism with numerous reviews, conferences and papers discussing the need for long-term investing. These include the incentives and behaviour of asset owners, asset managers

Smart beta: where is the value?

I’ve been contemplating the “smart beta” wave the industry seems to be riding at the moment. Cynically, part of that contemplation asks whether there is any innovation at play or whether it’s simply the industry playing with nomenclature once again. The answer is confusing, for while I’d like to be able to write it off

Hedging your bets? Back innovation for wealth creation

In 2012 there were 31 hedge fund managers on the Forbes 400 list, representing about 8 per cent of the wealthiest people in the US, up from 6 per cent the year before. Wealthy people on the whole don’t interest me, but innovation does. And the creation of wealth, and the creation of jobs and

What it is to lead

In reading the superb editorial that backgrounds the naming of Barrack Obama as Time magazine’s Person of the Year for 2012, it is clear one of the reasons he was chosen was his ability to embrace change. In particular he shows leadership of the new America, namely people under 30, Hispanics and African Americans. Adapting