Winners emerge from crowded field in UN PRI race

Six candidates have gained election to the advisory council of the UN PRI in a close-fought election that for the first time saw asset managers and service providers included.

There was strong interest in the elections for The Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative (PRI) Advisory Council, with more than 31 non-asset owner candidates for four positions and six asset owners for two positions.

It is understood more than 500 of the 920 signatories voted. Chief executive of investments at Dutch fund PFZW, Else Bos, and CalPERS board of administration member, Priya Sara Mathur, were the two asset owners elected to the 16-person council.

Aviva Investors UK chief executive, Paul Abberley, and Santander Asset Management Brazil, chief executive Luciane Ribeiro, were the two asset managers elected to the board.

Service providers won the remaining two places for non-asset owners. Responsible research director, Melissa Brown, and Australian Council of Superannuation Investors chief executive, Ann Byrne, were elected.

Under the rules governing regional representation on the council, Sopawadee Lertmanaschai from the Government Pension Fund of Thailand, John Oliphant from the Government Employers Pension Fund of South Africa, and Rene Sanda from Brazilian pension fund PREVI were automatically selected.

Sponsored Content

The PRI initiative was establish in 2006 and aims to promote responsible investment and ESG best practice.

Signatories agree to a voluntary set of six principles aimed at encouraging the incorporation of ESG aims into their organisations and the investment industry more broadly.

The PRI Advisory Council has been expanded to 16 positions drawn from the global signatory base.

It includes two UN representatives, nine asset owners from Europe, North America, Asia, Oceania, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. For the first time two investment managers and two service providers were included on the panel.

“The new governance structure marks a significant change for PRI, one that will benefit from the diverse representation of our asset owner, investment manager and service partner signatories in helping PRI realise its goals,” newly elected PRI Advisory Council Chair, Wolfgang Engshuber said.

One of two Australian representatives on the council, Bryne, who heads ACSI – a governance advisory organisation for the Australian superannuation industry – said she was focused on improving the practical focus of PRI and increasing its US membership.

“For us there are a couple of concerns and one is to make sure that the PRI is practically focused at implementing the principles and provides as much assistance as possible to its members,” Bryne said.

“But (it) does that in a practical way and shows an understanding of investment management processes and pension fund processes. The other big issue for the PRI is to increase the membership from the United States, there are so many assets in the US but there are not enough signatories who are focused on PRI principles in the US.”

US-based signatories to the UN PRI comprise of 19 asset owners, 83 asset managers and 27 service providers. This represents 14 per cent of signatories.

Overall 235 asset owners are signatories, 522 asset managers and 163 service providers.

Bryne said she also was focused on ensuring that the UN PRI was working appropriately with emerging market investors and asset managers.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Warren Buffett’s excellent adventure

'Youngster’ Warren Buffett (85) rebuffed risks from sugar and climate change as he toured the American economy with his ‘older’ offsider, Charlie Munger (92), presenting at the Berkshire Hathaway AGM .

Pay for performance

Pension fund executive pay varies widely around the globe, with differences based on internal management and alternatives exposures. Amanda White examines pension fund executive pay.

A long way to go

It’s all very well to have diversity, but most people lack the tools for how to get the best out of a diverse team. Instead the reverse is true and diversity can lead to an unlevel playing field.

Too much of a good thing

Experts at the Thinking Ahead Institute outline the pitfalls of implementing team diversity, , when too much diversity fails us, and how organisations can be champions for change.

Income the key dimension

Risk should be defined as the inability to meet retirement income goals, so investors and their managers should forget alpha and other “distractions”, according to David Booth.

Worlds colliding

The debate about the effect of pay inequality on both the financial and real-world markets is about to get a whole lot hotter this year.

Previous