Winners emerge from crowded field in UN PRI race

Six candidates have gained election to the advisory council of the UN PRI in a close-fought election that for the first time saw asset managers and service providers included.

There was strong interest in the elections for The Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative (PRI) Advisory Council, with more than 31 non-asset owner candidates for four positions and six asset owners for two positions.

It is understood more than 500 of the 920 signatories voted. Chief executive of investments at Dutch fund PFZW, Else Bos, and CalPERS board of administration member, Priya Sara Mathur, were the two asset owners elected to the 16-person council.

Aviva Investors UK chief executive, Paul Abberley, and Santander Asset Management Brazil, chief executive Luciane Ribeiro, were the two asset managers elected to the board.

Service providers won the remaining two places for non-asset owners. Responsible research director, Melissa Brown, and Australian Council of Superannuation Investors chief executive, Ann Byrne, were elected.

Under the rules governing regional representation on the council, Sopawadee Lertmanaschai from the Government Pension Fund of Thailand, John Oliphant from the Government Employers Pension Fund of South Africa, and Rene Sanda from Brazilian pension fund PREVI were automatically selected.

Sponsored Content

The PRI initiative was establish in 2006 and aims to promote responsible investment and ESG best practice.

Signatories agree to a voluntary set of six principles aimed at encouraging the incorporation of ESG aims into their organisations and the investment industry more broadly.

The PRI Advisory Council has been expanded to 16 positions drawn from the global signatory base.

It includes two UN representatives, nine asset owners from Europe, North America, Asia, Oceania, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. For the first time two investment managers and two service providers were included on the panel.

“The new governance structure marks a significant change for PRI, one that will benefit from the diverse representation of our asset owner, investment manager and service partner signatories in helping PRI realise its goals,” newly elected PRI Advisory Council Chair, Wolfgang Engshuber said.

One of two Australian representatives on the council, Bryne, who heads ACSI – a governance advisory organisation for the Australian superannuation industry – said she was focused on improving the practical focus of PRI and increasing its US membership.

“For us there are a couple of concerns and one is to make sure that the PRI is practically focused at implementing the principles and provides as much assistance as possible to its members,” Bryne said.

“But (it) does that in a practical way and shows an understanding of investment management processes and pension fund processes. The other big issue for the PRI is to increase the membership from the United States, there are so many assets in the US but there are not enough signatories who are focused on PRI principles in the US.”

US-based signatories to the UN PRI comprise of 19 asset owners, 83 asset managers and 27 service providers. This represents 14 per cent of signatories.

Overall 235 asset owners are signatories, 522 asset managers and 163 service providers.

Bryne said she also was focused on ensuring that the UN PRI was working appropriately with emerging market investors and asset managers.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tread carefully among systemic risks

Funds managers, pension trustee boards and fund members should adjust to a low-returns environment and think carefully about investment risk in such uncertain times, warned Tim Gardener, global head of consultant relations at AXA Investment Managers (AXA IM) and a veteran of the UK asset consulting industry.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Lone wolves may secure the best returns

Some animals instinctively gather as a herd, apparently pension funds are such animals. A new asset allocation study by academics at Maastricht and Yale, presented at the ICPM discussion forum last week, reveals the mob behaviour by funds when it comes to asset allocation, leaving way for security selection to be the differentiator in returns.mrec4inarticleinline

Defining the game is two sides of same coin

A constant whispering in the hallway of pension plans is how to prepare for the inevitable move from a defined benefit to defined-contribution structure. But fiduciaries shouldn’t be scared, the game’s the same, at least psychologically.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

APG’s IMQubator launches second fund

Dutch Pension fund administrator APG will open up innovative investment ideas to other institutional investors, with the IMQubator hedge fund seeding platform it has backed launching a second fund to channel money to emerging managers.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Myths may shackle SWFs

Chair of the A$75billion ($79bn) Australian Future Fund, and outgoing chair of the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds, David Murray (pictured), believes sovereign wealth funds are at risk of discrimination if some key myths about their structure and investment intentions are not discussed.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS slams ‘smoke and mirrors’ report

CalPERS has hit out at a report calling for radical change in the way California public sector pension benefits are calculated, describing the authors’ methodology as flawed and ideologically slanted.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous