Texas CIO dismisses calls for flexibility

A successful tactical bet by the investment team of the Teacher Retirement System of Texas fuelled a heated debate at the April investment committee meeting which concluded with chief investment officer, Britt Harris, dismissing the need for more flexibility in the fund’s policy statement.

For more than a year the fund had an overweight position to credit, and an underweighting of 5.5 per cent to long treasury bonds, which was the fund’s largest risk position at an asset allocation level.

The investments were primarily in dislocated credit, and the allocation was a large contributor to the fund’s outperformance, and top ranking in its peer group, for the 2010 period.

Subsequent analysis of the performance, and the fund’s asset allocation positions, at the most recent board meeting triggered discussion about the appropriate benchmark against which to measure such outperformance.

It was also suggested that staff should have the flexibility to make an opportunistic play, and perhaps a percentage allocation be made for opportunistic or tactical bets.

Chief investment officer, Britt Harris, dismissed this idea, saying: “We have all the flexibility we need. There are tactical asset allocation ranges within the investment policy statement.”

Sponsored Content

The fund’s consultants, Hewitt Ennis Knapp, said by any measure the fund outperformed, whether the benchmark be LIBOR+200 or Lehman 10-year swap.

The consultant also said another alternative was to benchmark the performance against the policy asset allocation as an aggregate, or an opportunity cost benchmark.

Looking at the fund’s investment performance attribution revealed 80 basis points of outperformance was due to asset allocation, including the tactical credit position, while security selection accounted for 90 basis points.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous