No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.

Windham, which is a Boston-based risk management firm and a State Street Associates founding partner, looks at the world according to a proprietary Investment Risk Cycle, which describes how financial turbulence and systemic risk interact with each other and how that interaction impacts asset values.

According to Turton, the manager identifies six states of the world, each with “high” or “low” ratings for systemic risk and turbulence. In building portfolios, investors need to be cognisant that assets behave differently to each other within those different states.

“When there is low systemic risk and low turbulence, then you make a lot of money when you take risk. In state six, the other end of the spectrum, growth investors lose money, and there is high systemic risk and high turbulence,” he says.

Windham’s view is that the market is currently around “five”, which means investors should be cautious with risk.

“This means investors will not be compensated for taking excessive risk,” he says.

Sponsored Content

To put this in context, during the global financial crisis the risk cycle was at “six”, but with levels of systemic risk and turbulence that hadn’t been seen before.

“On a scale of one to six, the GFC was more like an eight,” Turton says. “Looking back at the data, because the financial sector was so important in driving risk, the response in the market was more severe than in the technology sector crisis. Moving forward we see the energy sector as a big factor in pushing markets around. There are too few observations to draw great conclusions, but energy, oil shocks and commodity prices are something to watch.”

Turton says the manager believes there are fewer opportunities in risky assets, so its strategies are below benchmark risk. The Windham Portfolio, which is the largest portfolio, has 50 per cent growth assets as its benchmark.

“We don’t want to frighten people, but they need to understand [that] being more aggressive in certain environments is more appropriate than others,” he says.

Windham, which uses ETFs to implement its strategies, believes that understanding and focusing on how risk evolves, not just when it occurs, means you can take advantage of the relationship between risk and return in different market cycles.

But Turton says Windham does not aim to predict the market outcome, or “win the one-week trade”.

On average, it trades five times a year.

“But the average is not to be expected,” Turton says. “In August we reduced risk twice. But previously we were in state one from August 2009 to November 2010 when we rebalanced and then changed our view.”

“You might get the relative value of Coke versus Pepsi right, but when systemic risk is high then they are both going down.”

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethinking investment performance attribution

As asset owners move away from silo-based investment decision making, their performance attribution systems also need to evolve. The Alberta Investment Management Corporation AimCo, the C$70 billion arm’s length investment manager for public sector assets in Alberta, Canada, has implemented a new performance attribution system based on how managers actually make their investment decisions.  

Benchmark design for an active investment process

Choosing the appropriate benchmark for active managers is a common debate among institutional investors. Norges Bank Investment Management has produced a “discussion note’ on the benchmark design for an active investment process, in which it introduces a flexible modelling framework that aims to incentivise each portfolio manager to utilise their stock-picking skill.   The benchmark

SSgA focuses on innovation not assets

For Scott Powers, president and chief executive of State Street Global Advisors, assets under management is not a measure of success – the manager is currently the world’s fourth largest with around $2.5 trillion. Instead it is the ability to provide value for clients in meeting their objectives – whether it be matching liabilities, creating

Pension funds put pressure on G20 tax reform

Pension funds are becoming vocal ahead of the G20 leaders summit next week, reiterating the need for action over tax reform, and encouraging world leaders to consider financial reform that encourages long-term investing. The UK’s Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, which is a collaborative shareholder engagement group of 61 local authority pension funds with combined

G20 urged to develop policies to support long-term investment

The Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University has identified several of the key barriers to pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds adopting more effective long-term and sustainable investment strategies, and is preparing a communiqué to the upcoming meeting of the G20 to convey its concerns and its policy requirements. FIS, organised and hosted

Future Fund focuses on finding the best people

Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, the A$101 billion Future Fund, has just upped the stakes in not only attracting the best co-investment deals from fund managers, but in its bid to attract the world’s best investment professionals. Two months ago the fund’s long serving chief investment officer, David Neal, become chief executive in name (following the

Previous