Rethinking investment performance attribution

As asset owners move away from silo-based investment decision making, their performance attribution systems also need to evolve. The Alberta Investment Management Corporation AimCo, the C$70 billion arm’s length investment manager for public sector assets in Alberta, Canada, has implemented a new performance attribution system based on how managers actually make their investment decisions.

 

In an article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, authors Jagdeep Singh Baccher, Leo de Bever, Roman Chuyan and Ashby Monk, outline the history of the organisation’s investment performance attribution system, which was essentially a decomposition of the total value added in the prescribed “allocation” and “selection” buckets.

The new decision-based attribution system was designed to mirror the way AimCo actually makes investment decisions.

This includes which agents in the ecosystem are adding value – from the chief investment officer in asset allocation decision making, to the heads of assets classes making decisions about various markets within asset classes, and portfolio managers and analysts making decisions about specific stocks and bonds.

In addition to tactical asset allocation decisions, the new system also considers opportunistic decisions that don’t fit within an asset class.

Sponsored Content

As outlined in the article, the authors say the new decision-based attribution system has materially improved AimCo’s ability to understand the relationship between investment decisions and investment results.

This is particularly important given that performance attribution should not just explain the past, but be a tool to make better future investment decisions.

 

The full article can be accessed below

Rethinking Investment Performance Attribution

 

Jagdeep Singh Bachher was executive vice-president at AimCo when the article was written, he is now the chief investment officer of the University of California

Leo de Bever is chief executive of AimCo

Roman Chuyan is president and chief investment officer at Model Capital Management

Ashby Monk is executive director of Stanford University’s Global Projects Center

Asset Owner:AIMCo

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Dutch reform to tread lightly on investment mix

When the Netherlands pension reforms were announced in 2011, many experts argued they were likely to substantially increase the risk appetites at the funds guarding the country’s $1-trillion pension assets. Recent developments to the reform proposals make the overall impact far from clear, however, suggesting there will be no bonanza for Dutch investment managers. The

Previous