PIMCO predicts a “new normal” to reign in investment markets

A “new normal” will reign in investment markets after the shocks of last year, according to PIMCO, with the manager’s secular outlook favouring investment at the front-end of the yield curve as well as income producing instruments. This article looks at the outcomes of its recent secular forum including a call for investment management vehicles to be made more responsive and robust.

PIMCO’s secular forum, attended by investment professionals globally, guides the way it structures portfolios in terms of duration, yield curve position, sector exposure and credit quality. It is the manager’s belief that secular economic, political and social trends exert the most influence on bond markets. After its most recent meeting that outlook will be a journey of stops, starts and volatility.

The forum, attended by global PIMCO staff as well as external participants including former Federal Reserve chairman, Alan Greenspan, and Nobel laureate in Economics, Mike Spence, concluded that the next three to five years will be characterised by slow growth in developed economies, with emerging economies to bifurcate, short term deflation and long term inflation, and US dollar risk.

As a result PIMCO, which manages $756 billion in assets, says an environment of low growth and political uncertainty favours high-quality, yield-oriented securities over those offering mainly capital gains.

In addition it says a focus on global securities, over US bonds, will yield benefits, and investors should look to protect themselves against a weaker US dollar.

Sponsored Content

According to CEO and Co-CIO Mohamed El-Elrain, in his summary of the conference posted on the PIMCO website, the world has changed in a manner that is unlikely to be reversed over the next few years.

“Put another way, markets are recovering from a shock that goes way, way beyond a cyclical flesh wound.

“It is not just about the major realignment of the financial system and the extent to which governments have intervened to offset market failures. And it goes beyond the massive increase in government deficits and
government debt in virtually every systemically important country in the world (at a time when few countries can credibly pre-commit to the type of fiscal primary surplus required to subsequently reverse the massive deterioration in the debt dynamics),” he says.

“It’s also about the structural change in how savings are mobilized and allocated, nationally and across borders. It is about the shifting balance between the public and private sectors. And we should not forget the potentially long-lasting consequences of the erosion of trust in such basic parameters of a market system as the sanctity of contracts and
property rights, the rule of law, and the robustness of the capital structure. Such trust can be lost quickly but takes a long time to restore.”

The PIMCO dubbed “new normal” is increasingly resonating in policy circles and among market practitioners, reflecting a growing realisation that some of the changes to markets, households, institutions, and government policies are unlikely to be reversed in the next few years, El-Elrain says.

“Markets will revert to a mean, but it will not look anything like that of recent years. Relative to where it is coming from, the financial system will be de-levered, de-globalised, and re-regulated. Global growth will be lower and unemployment higher, notwithstanding the continued rotation of dynamism away from industrial countries and toward emerging economies. Price formation in many markets will be influenced by the legacy and, in some cases, continuation of direct government involvement. Burden sharing will feature more prominently, being one feature of the heavier hand of government in economic life,” he says.

“For a financial industry known for its famously short memory (and related infrastructures and behaviour), this will feel like a new normal. Adaptations will be needed as the configuration of risks and returns shift, government debt balloons, and capital structures potentially migrate toward a simplified structure consisting just of equity and senior debt instruments. Business models will need to be retooled, and investment management vehicles made more responsive and robust.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous