Pension funds to sustain climate change pressure

Pension funds globally should maintain the pressure on governments to deliver on their promised emission reduction targets, in the wake of a “disappointing” result in Copenhagen, according to the executive director of the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, Stephanie Pfeifer.

While the Copenhagen summit produced “good momentum” from countries which hadn’t made commitments before, such as Brazil and China, she said the lack of a legally binding agreement was disappointing.

In the first half of 2010 the IIGCC will focus on policy in order to push for a legally binding treaty before COP in Mexico at the end of the year.

“What we need to do is keep up the pressure and call on these countries to do what they said they would do,” she said.

Pfeifer said one hopeful aspect of the Copenhagen accord was the blank tables at the back of the document allowing each country to fill out their own targets. This needs to be completed before the end of January but it remains to be seen if this will be legally binding.

Sponsored Content

The IIGCC, which is a forum for collaboration on climate change for European investors, collaborated with other regional organisations in September to sign a policy statement calling for a strong and binding international treaty that will reduce pollution and catalyse massive global investments in low-carbon technologies. It was signed by 181 investors with collective assets of $13 trillion.

A recent study commissioned by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change showed the private sector would have to supply close to 90 per cent of the funds needed to meet the climate change challenge.

One of the key objectives of the group is to catalyse greater investment in a low carbon economy by bringing investors together to use their collective influence with companies, policymakers and investors.

It will continue to survey investors on how they incorporate climate change into their long-term investment strategies, and is collaborating with Mercer once again to survey pension funds in January.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous