PE investors warily keen on Asia-Pacific

The latest review of private equity markets around the world by Partners Group shows continued favouritism for the Asia-Pacific growth story but a rising wariness about competitiveness and prices.

The six-monthly report, for the first half of 2011, has Asia and other emerging markets showing more attractive investment categories across the PE size and style spectrum than Europe and North America combined.

Of particular interest are mid- and small-cap direct investments and mid- and small-cap primaries; venture and growth direct and primaries; and consumer, IT and industrials in the buyout sectors.

Direct investments involve funds-of-funds managers, such as Partners Group, investing directly in companies, whereas primaries involve first investments through other fund managers. Secondaries involve the recapitalisation of a company or group of companies after initial PE investments.

The regular report by Partners Group, one of the largest PE managers in the world with about US$27.8 billion under management, highlights both areas of opportunity and areas for concern for a full range of PE categories.

It says: “Asia and emerging markets remain an area of special attention, in line with our positive economic outlook and the fundamental trends towards rising wealth amid the impressive expansion of the middle class…

Sponsored Content

“In general, we are convinced that private markets investments in China and other emerging markets offer more attractive investment opportunities than public market investments.

“While public markets in the developing world have seen immense capital inflows over the last years, the pace of private equity investing has been in line with the pace of fund raising. Another argument favouring private markets is that public equities are often skewed towards volatile financials and energy companies while private equity typically offers a more balanced exposure with its focus on consumer-driven industries.”

Andreas Baumann, Partners’ managing director for PE and co-head of Asia, said: “It’s nice to invest in an economy with strong growth prospects. But it is also true that these markets are very hot. There is a lot of money attracted to them. Even though there’s a good tailwind, at the end of the day it comes back to how much you’re prepared to pay. You have to be mindful of that.”

He said that most emerging markets were also very competitive, particularly in China, where there are hundreds of RMB-denominated funds, and where Partners Group has one of its 14 offices around the world – in Beijing.

With respect to China, Baumann said there are a couple of ways to deal with the high level of competition: investors can try to avoid the “next” consumer growth story. Partners is now looking for more specific themes in, perhaps, more niche industries. There are also certain sectors which offer long-term sustainable growth, such as health care and education.

Investors can also access China indirectly, through neighbouring countries with strong trade ties. For example, Partners has invested in a tyre mould manufacturer in Korea which derives most of its revenue from China. The purchase price was less than six times EBITDA, which would be difficult to source in China.

Similarly, in Latin America the PE market has developed such that investors need to look for opportunities which may be “below the radar”.

Baumann said: “For most people Latin America means Brazil. It’s the gorilla and we’re very bullish on Brazil … However some countries such as Chile and Peru are below the radar. Peru is more emerging and offers some good opportunities. Also Argentina. We haven’t done anything there for a long time and obviously there’s political risk, but an opportunistic exposure makes sense.”

As for Europe and North America, the Partners report shows only the financials category in venture and growth in North America as being in its most attractive grouping. Large-cap buyouts on both continents should be underweighted, along with media and telecommunications direct buyouts.

Asia and emerging markets have no recommended underweight’s across the various segments.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous