PE investors warily keen on Asia-Pacific

The latest review of private equity markets around the world by Partners Group shows continued favouritism for the Asia-Pacific growth story but a rising wariness about competitiveness and prices.

The six-monthly report, for the first half of 2011, has Asia and other emerging markets showing more attractive investment categories across the PE size and style spectrum than Europe and North America combined.

Of particular interest are mid- and small-cap direct investments and mid- and small-cap primaries; venture and growth direct and primaries; and consumer, IT and industrials in the buyout sectors.

Direct investments involve funds-of-funds managers, such as Partners Group, investing directly in companies, whereas primaries involve first investments through other fund managers. Secondaries involve the recapitalisation of a company or group of companies after initial PE investments.

The regular report by Partners Group, one of the largest PE managers in the world with about US$27.8 billion under management, highlights both areas of opportunity and areas for concern for a full range of PE categories.

It says: “Asia and emerging markets remain an area of special attention, in line with our positive economic outlook and the fundamental trends towards rising wealth amid the impressive expansion of the middle class…

Sponsored Content

“In general, we are convinced that private markets investments in China and other emerging markets offer more attractive investment opportunities than public market investments.

“While public markets in the developing world have seen immense capital inflows over the last years, the pace of private equity investing has been in line with the pace of fund raising. Another argument favouring private markets is that public equities are often skewed towards volatile financials and energy companies while private equity typically offers a more balanced exposure with its focus on consumer-driven industries.”

Andreas Baumann, Partners’ managing director for PE and co-head of Asia, said: “It’s nice to invest in an economy with strong growth prospects. But it is also true that these markets are very hot. There is a lot of money attracted to them. Even though there’s a good tailwind, at the end of the day it comes back to how much you’re prepared to pay. You have to be mindful of that.”

He said that most emerging markets were also very competitive, particularly in China, where there are hundreds of RMB-denominated funds, and where Partners Group has one of its 14 offices around the world – in Beijing.

With respect to China, Baumann said there are a couple of ways to deal with the high level of competition: investors can try to avoid the “next” consumer growth story. Partners is now looking for more specific themes in, perhaps, more niche industries. There are also certain sectors which offer long-term sustainable growth, such as health care and education.

Investors can also access China indirectly, through neighbouring countries with strong trade ties. For example, Partners has invested in a tyre mould manufacturer in Korea which derives most of its revenue from China. The purchase price was less than six times EBITDA, which would be difficult to source in China.

Similarly, in Latin America the PE market has developed such that investors need to look for opportunities which may be “below the radar”.

Baumann said: “For most people Latin America means Brazil. It’s the gorilla and we’re very bullish on Brazil … However some countries such as Chile and Peru are below the radar. Peru is more emerging and offers some good opportunities. Also Argentina. We haven’t done anything there for a long time and obviously there’s political risk, but an opportunistic exposure makes sense.”

As for Europe and North America, the Partners report shows only the financials category in venture and growth in North America as being in its most attractive grouping. Large-cap buyouts on both continents should be underweighted, along with media and telecommunications direct buyouts.

Asia and emerging markets have no recommended underweight’s across the various segments.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous