Norway’s SWF 8.8% loss in Q3

The Norwegian Government’s 3055 billion kroner ($544.9 billion) pension fund lost 8.8 per cent during the third quarter of this year, on the back of falling share markets. But its fund manager says most of the fund’s new capital inflows are still being pumped into global share markets.

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the Government Pension Fund Global, reported that the fund’s share investments lost 16.9 per cent in the third quarter of this year.

The overall loss in the third quarter is the fund’s second-weakest quarterly return in its 21-year history and 0.3 percentage points lower than the return on the benchmark indices.

“Europe’s debt crisis and fears of a global economic slowdown weighed on stocks in the quarter,” says Yngve Slyngstad (pictured), chief executive officer of NBIM, the investment arm of Norway’s central bank.

“Most of the fund’s new capital was placed into equities to exploit the declines and take advantage of our long-term perspective.”

The fund lost 284 billion kroner in the period, partially offset by capital inflows from the Government of 78 billion kroner and a weakening of the krone against several major currencies, which increased the market value of the fund by 150 billion kroner.

Sponsored Content

The Norwegian Government requires the fund to have between 50 per cent and 70 per cent of the fund’s market value invested in equities, 30 to 50 per cent in bonds, and 0.5 per cent in real estate.

It currently has 55.6 per cent of the fund in equities, 44.1 per cent in bonds and 0.3 per cent in real estate.

European financial stocks were the fund’s worst performing equity segment, losing 27.3 per cent in the quarter, measured against a basket of international currencies? Financials generally lost 22.1 per cent in the quarter, after sovereign debt concerns battered the sector.

Financial stocks make up the fund’s biggest equity sector, accounting for 20 per cent of stocks at the end of the period.

The fund’s worst performing stock investment, in nominal terms, was BNP Paribas, followed by Siemens and Daimler. The best performers were Apple, Vodafone and IBM.

Investments in oil and gas stocks constituted 11 per cent of equity holdings. The fund’s healthcare stocks performed best, losing 7.2 per cent in the quarter.

About half of the fund’s equity investments are in Europe (with a return of -20.7 per cent for the quarter); 35 per cent in the Americas, Africa and the Middle East (-13.4 per cent for the quarter); and 15 per cent in Asia and Oceania (-12.4 per cent).

At a country-specific level, US and UK stocks underperformed the benchmark, while Spanish and Australian equities beat the benchmark.

Generally, equity investments lagged behind global benchmark indices for stocks from the FTSE Group by 0.5 percentage points in the quarter. About 85 per cent of this negative return came from internal management and the remainder from external management.

Broken down into sectors, the basic materials area, which includes metal fertiliser and chemical producers, was the worst performer relative to its benchmark.

Holdings in technology stocks outperformed the benchmark.

A bright spot for the fund was its bond portfolio, which returned 3.7 per cent in the third quarter, as measured against a basket of international currencies.

Gains were helped by ongoing uncertainty about the world economy, with increased demand for “safer” investments, from countries such as Germany, France, the UK and the US.

The fund’s government bond holdings returned 7 per cent in the quarter.

Securitised debt – typically bonds secured by home mortgages – was the weakest of the fixed-income investments, followed by corporate bonds. Securitised debt returned 0.3 per cent and corporate debt 0.7 per cent for the quarter.

Overall, the return on fixed-income investments matched the benchmark.

This year the fund also expanded its investments to include real estate. In April it bought a 25 per cent stage in The Crown Estate’s Regent Street portfolio in London.

In its second foray into real estate in July, the fund bought a 50 per cent stake in seven properties in and around Paris for 702.5 million Euros ($972.1 million).

Over the past three years the fund has made a 4.86 per cent return, exceeding its benchmark by 0.79 percentage points. Over a 10-year period it has returned 4.2 per cent, outperforming its benchmark by 0.24 percentage points.

The Government Pension Fund Global is NBIM’s largest investment mandate.

The fund was set up in 1990 to manage Norway’s petroleum revenues.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Blinder: a power of paradox at Princeton

Pension funds or any investor holding a slug of long-term fixed income needs to factor in some capital losses soon, says Princeton academic and former vice president of the Federal Reserve, Alan Blinder. “The timing is difficult to predict, but three or 15 months, it doesn’t matter. It is predictable,” he says. “The unpredictable part

UniSuper defies accepted thinking

Mention any asset class to John Pearce, chief investment officer of Australian superannuation fund UniSuper, and he will doggedly set out the good and bad thinking around it. A common source of his ire is the sight of investors herding around a belief based on a lack of rigorous thinking. Good practice for him involves

OTPP deals with underfunding

Even the most successful and well run pension plans are facing underfunding challenges. The $129-billion Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan is the latest to investigate solutions to solve the mismatch between the pension promise and the funds required to meet that, says Jim Leech, chief executive of the organisation . OTPP has appointed a taskforce – chaired

Fewer, bigger funds for UK?

Australia, the US, Canada and Denmark have all done it. Kazakhstan and even Oman are talking about it. Increasingly, public sector pension funds are merging or pooling their assets into fewer bigger schemes. It’s no surprise the debate is gathering momentum in the United Kingdom, ripe for consolidation with a Local Government Pension Fund Scheme

Scenario analysis: applicable to anything?

Attempts to apply a formula to asset allocation based on an asset’s historical volatility and relationship with other assets tend to fail when presented with black-swan events. Equities tend to rise along with commodities except when presented with political events such as the price hikes in oil in 1973 that sent equities into free fall.

Kurtzer on Holy Land of opportunity

The Middle East is in a state of dynamic flux, with positive change manifesting itself in the countries going through an economic and financial revolution as much as a political one. Institutional investors from all parts of the world have a role to play in that revolution, according to former US ambassador to Egypt and

Previous