Norway’s SWF 8.8% loss in Q3

The Norwegian Government’s 3055 billion kroner ($544.9 billion) pension fund lost 8.8 per cent during the third quarter of this year, on the back of falling share markets. But its fund manager says most of the fund’s new capital inflows are still being pumped into global share markets.

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the Government Pension Fund Global, reported that the fund’s share investments lost 16.9 per cent in the third quarter of this year.

The overall loss in the third quarter is the fund’s second-weakest quarterly return in its 21-year history and 0.3 percentage points lower than the return on the benchmark indices.

“Europe’s debt crisis and fears of a global economic slowdown weighed on stocks in the quarter,” says Yngve Slyngstad (pictured), chief executive officer of NBIM, the investment arm of Norway’s central bank.

“Most of the fund’s new capital was placed into equities to exploit the declines and take advantage of our long-term perspective.”

The fund lost 284 billion kroner in the period, partially offset by capital inflows from the Government of 78 billion kroner and a weakening of the krone against several major currencies, which increased the market value of the fund by 150 billion kroner.

Sponsored Content

The Norwegian Government requires the fund to have between 50 per cent and 70 per cent of the fund’s market value invested in equities, 30 to 50 per cent in bonds, and 0.5 per cent in real estate.

It currently has 55.6 per cent of the fund in equities, 44.1 per cent in bonds and 0.3 per cent in real estate.

European financial stocks were the fund’s worst performing equity segment, losing 27.3 per cent in the quarter, measured against a basket of international currencies? Financials generally lost 22.1 per cent in the quarter, after sovereign debt concerns battered the sector.

Financial stocks make up the fund’s biggest equity sector, accounting for 20 per cent of stocks at the end of the period.

The fund’s worst performing stock investment, in nominal terms, was BNP Paribas, followed by Siemens and Daimler. The best performers were Apple, Vodafone and IBM.

Investments in oil and gas stocks constituted 11 per cent of equity holdings. The fund’s healthcare stocks performed best, losing 7.2 per cent in the quarter.

About half of the fund’s equity investments are in Europe (with a return of -20.7 per cent for the quarter); 35 per cent in the Americas, Africa and the Middle East (-13.4 per cent for the quarter); and 15 per cent in Asia and Oceania (-12.4 per cent).

At a country-specific level, US and UK stocks underperformed the benchmark, while Spanish and Australian equities beat the benchmark.

Generally, equity investments lagged behind global benchmark indices for stocks from the FTSE Group by 0.5 percentage points in the quarter. About 85 per cent of this negative return came from internal management and the remainder from external management.

Broken down into sectors, the basic materials area, which includes metal fertiliser and chemical producers, was the worst performer relative to its benchmark.

Holdings in technology stocks outperformed the benchmark.

A bright spot for the fund was its bond portfolio, which returned 3.7 per cent in the third quarter, as measured against a basket of international currencies.

Gains were helped by ongoing uncertainty about the world economy, with increased demand for “safer” investments, from countries such as Germany, France, the UK and the US.

The fund’s government bond holdings returned 7 per cent in the quarter.

Securitised debt – typically bonds secured by home mortgages – was the weakest of the fixed-income investments, followed by corporate bonds. Securitised debt returned 0.3 per cent and corporate debt 0.7 per cent for the quarter.

Overall, the return on fixed-income investments matched the benchmark.

This year the fund also expanded its investments to include real estate. In April it bought a 25 per cent stage in The Crown Estate’s Regent Street portfolio in London.

In its second foray into real estate in July, the fund bought a 50 per cent stake in seven properties in and around Paris for 702.5 million Euros ($972.1 million).

Over the past three years the fund has made a 4.86 per cent return, exceeding its benchmark by 0.79 percentage points. Over a 10-year period it has returned 4.2 per cent, outperforming its benchmark by 0.24 percentage points.

The Government Pension Fund Global is NBIM’s largest investment mandate.

The fund was set up in 1990 to manage Norway’s petroleum revenues.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous