New method for incentive compensation at CalPERS

CalPERS is contemplating an incentive schedule for senior investment executives that builds in downside risk, by expanding the range of the factor multipliers for the quantitative elements of investment performance plans, a move which could potentially eliminate a small compensation incentive award.


Staff were asked to present sample data reflecting an incentive schedule for demonstration purposes at the August performance and compensation committee, for the quantitative elements of investment performance plans that would build in downside risk by expanding the range from the existing 0 to 1.5 to -1.0 to 2.5.

Michael Schlachter, managing director of Wilshire, presented projected estimated changes in the incentive compensation if the factor multipliers were changed, based on December 2008 performance.

The analysis, which looked at expanded ranges of -1.0 to 2.5, and -2.0 to 3.5, showed that a small incentive compensation award under the current methodology would be eliminated under the expansion of the ranges, for the chief investment officer and investment staff.

For some staff, including asset allocation, risk management, AIM, and fixed income portfolio managers, the new ranges would result in a negative award, because of the structure of their incentive program.

However these changes would only effect the quantitative element of the incentive program, which makes up 75 per cent for most investment staff.

Sponsored Content

The chief investment officer, Joe Dear, is awarded incentive compensation based on 25 per cent leadership factors (qualitative) with the remaining 75 per cent quantitatively based on the performance over a designated benchmark of the total fund (40 per cent) and each of the five major investment divisions (7 per cent each).

In minutes of the performance and compensation committee, chief of the human resources division, Chris O’Brien recommended approving the second reading of the performance plans for the 2009-2010 fiscal year for the chief investment officer, chief operating investment officer, senior investment officers, senior portfolio managers and portfolio managers.

Under goal IV of CalPERS’ strategic plan, the organisation is dedicated to effectively utilising its resources, including a diverse, creative, motivated, high performance workplace. This can be accomplished at the highest executive levels through the establishment of methods that provide broad flexibility in the recruitment, retention and compensation of key personnel.

Wilshire is in the process of calculating actual fiscal year 2009 incentive compensation.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous