New Jersey chair calls for allocation review

Chair of the investment council of the $70 billion State of New Jersey’s Division of Investment, Robert Grady, has called for a new asset allocation plan, pointing in particular to the fund’s cash position which sits at around 2.75 per cent. The fund has also been overweight its domestic equity allocation by about 6 per cent since the last target was set in March.

At the November board meeting, director Tim Walsh advised the division was working to reduce the fund’s cash position, and Grady said “the need to look at the fund’s cash position was particularly germane given the need to dvelop a new asset allcoaiton plan”.

At that board meeting, the fund’s consultant, Peter Kelioutis of Strategic Investment Solutions, said a new asset allocation plan would not be set at the annual meeting; rather, the council would debate approaches to ascertain what was best for the fund.

The fund’s last asset allocation change saw US equities reduced from 21.85 per cent to 18 per cent, but it has been overweight this level by about 6 per cent each month since.

Kelioutis said if a new asset allocation was recommended after the meeting, it would most likely be adopted in the Northern hemisphere spring, one year since the current plan was adopted.

The major change in March 2010, which was decreasing target allocation for US equities, was done to reflect the 2009 market rally, according to the 2010-2011 investment plan outline.

Sponsored Content

The outline acknowledged this allocation was substantially overweight relative to the 2009 ranges set for public equities, and underweight in inflation-sensitive and alternative investments. Since the new asset allocation the difference between target allocations and actual allocations have jumped from 4.53 per cent in February 2010 to 7.19 per cent in April 2010.

At the end of November, the financial year-to-date performance for the fund was 8.71 per cent, slightly outperforming its benchmark’s 8.53 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous