More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs.

Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper finds that these economies of scale are solely driven by management costs.

Using a unique dataset of 225 Dutch occupational pension funds with a total of €928 billion of assets under management, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the relation between investment costs and pension fund size.

The dataset is free from self-reporting biases and decomposes investment costs for six asset classes in management costs and performance fees.

The key finding of the paper is that a pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management, has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs.

Moreover, the effect disappears when asset allocation is not controlled for, indicating that larger pension funds invest relatively more in asset classes with higher investment costs.

Sponsored Content

Economies of scale do, however, differ per asset class.

“We find significant economies of scale in fixed income, equity and commodity portfolios, but not in real estate investments, private equity and hedge funds,” the authors say. “We also find that large pension funds pay significantly higher performance fees for equity, private equity and hedge fund investments.

“We find that performance fees significantly impact investment costs for equities, private equity and hedge funds. For these asset classes, we find that a tenfold increase in size raises performance fees by 0.74, 41.49 and 33.36 basis points respectively.”

The paper looks at the decomposition of investment costs into management costs and performance fees for six separate asset classes: equity, fixed income, real estate, commodities, private equity and hedge funds.

 

To access the full paper click below

Scale economies in pension fund investments – a dissection of investment costs across asset classes 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Dutch reform to tread lightly on investment mix

When the Netherlands pension reforms were announced in 2011, many experts argued they were likely to substantially increase the risk appetites at the funds guarding the country’s $1-trillion pension assets. Recent developments to the reform proposals make the overall impact far from clear, however, suggesting there will be no bonanza for Dutch investment managers. The

Previous