Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair

The time for ideological argument was over, said the chair of the Stronger Super Committee, Paul Costello, and the industry should work constructively to implement the Australian Government’s response to the Cooper Review.

Costello and the rest of the committee met for the first time last week with the Minister for Superannuation, Bill Shorten, and the first priority was to appoint working committees for the four reform streams to be implemented: MySuper, SuperStream, Governance and SMSFs.

While the committee will provide broad, high-level advice on the design and implementation of the reforms, the working committees will drill down into technical specifics, and give practitioners beyond those on the committee a chance for further input.

Costello said this should address any concerns about a lack of direct operational expertise on the committee, none of whom have ever run a large super fund, with the exception of course of Costello himself. (He was CEO at Superannuation Trust of Australia and New Zealand Super, before his four-year stint at the helm of the Future Fund Management Agency.)

The working committees are close to be finalised, Costello said. Their prompt formation was necessary because Costello planned to hand the Federal Treasury the Committee’s implementation recommendations by “May or June”.

The industry veteran said he wanted to be part of the Stronger Super implementation because it could help provide a better retirement for working Australians, and he urged stakeholders to keep that goal in mind.

Sponsored Content

“The [Stronger Super] report will record where there are differences in preferred approach by the committee members, but I think the Government is really interested in consensus,” he said.

Acknowledging that ‘MySuper’ was one of the most controversial aspects of the reforms, Costello said the committee would give regard to maximising the long-term net returns received by working Australians, and not just minimising the upfront costs incurred by their fund.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

One response to “Let’s work together quickly: Stronger Super chair”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous