Investors take credit in Say on Pay reform

Investor action through letters and company dialogue has resulted in more than 40 companies in the US, including Goldman Sachs, State Street, BNY Mellon and Conoco, agreeing to implement Say on Pay reform, according to Timothy Smith, senior vice president, Walden Asset Management who recently coordinated a letter signed by investors including CalPERS chief investment officer Joe Dear, urging 17 financial institutions, including Bank of America, to adopt reform.

“We believe it is critically important for investors to engage companies on say on pay via letters, dialogue and shareholder resolutions. The average vote on these resolutions in this last year’s proxy season was close to 46 per cent, with more than 25 votes over 50 per cent, which sent a very strong message to management,” he said.

CalPERS was among 30 investors that signed the open letter to 17 financial institutions asking them to follow other financial services industry companies to enact the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation, or Say on Pay.

“We applaud Goldman Sachs, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon for leading the way to enact this important corporate governance reform,” Joe Dear said in a statement. “While CalPERS doesn’t see a shareowner advisory vote as a panacea, companies that adopt the policy will significantly advance sound governance goals of improved accountability to investors and the creation of long-term share value.”

Smith said investors were at the forefront of the reform movement, and while there was still hope that legislation would provide guidance for all companies, it is unclear where the Senate vote is headed.

Sponsored Content

The letter went to 17 companies including Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Northern Trust, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Waddell & Reed, BB&T, Capital One Financial, American Express, PNC Financial Services, SunTrust, Fifth Third, Comerica, KeyCorp and Regions Financial.

Other signatories include representatives of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System; United Methodist Church General Board of Pension and Health Benefits; Firefighters’ Pension Systems of Kansas City, Mo.; TIAA-CREF; and the Council of Institutional Investors.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous