Governance review to facilitate speedy decisions at SWFs

Sovereign wealth funds are prioritising a review of their internal risk management frameworks and better communication with their stakeholders regarding expectations of financial markets, according to Patricia Pascuzzo, global head of national funds consulting at Mercer.

Pascuzzo, who was invited to speak at the recent Kuwaiti meeting of the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds said more than half of the 20 SWFs in attendance at that meeting were examining these issues.

She said Mercer was recommending SWFs conduct an organisational-wide review of risk management including financial risk, the approach to asset allocation, operational risks, the organisation of the internal team, and whether to insource or outsource.

“All sovereign wealth funds are different, and a lot don’t have independence from the government,” she said. “Some of them need to review their governance, to make decisions with speed in order to take advantage of
the opportunities in the market.

She pointed to a more dynamic approach to strategic asset allocation as an area of focus for the funds, but given that dynamic asset allocation was a more sophisticated strategy, a disciplined governance framework was also essential.

She said Mercer, which under her lead and with four regional heads was adapting its consulting services and products to the particular needs of these national funds, was seeing a lot of interest in its operational risk management and dynamic asset allocation services.

Sponsored Content

From an investment perspective, she said many SWFs were still sitting on the sidelines, although some had started looking at alternatives, insurance-linked securities and credit.

At the Kuwaiti meeting in early April, at which Pascuzzo addressed the funds, the International Working Group of Sovereign Wealth Funds formally established the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds that would meet at least once a year to exchange views on issues of common interest and facilitate an understanding of the generally accepted principles and practices, the Santiago Principles, and SWFs’ activities.

David Murray, chairman of Australia’s Future Fund board of guardians, was elected by the IWG members to chair the forum, and Jin Liqun, chairman of the board of supervisors at China Investment Corporation, and Bader Mohammad Al-Sa’ad, managing director of Kuwait Investment Authority were elected deputy chairs.

The forum noted, in particular, the pledge to do whatever was necessary to promote global trade and investment and reject protectionism, to underpin prosperity.

Speaking at the same meeting, Kuwait’s deputy prime minister and minister of foreign affairs Sheikh Dr. Mohammed Sabah Al-Salem Al-Sabah, said it was critical to recognise that conditions and the environment of the global markets and the international financial system were set to change, and it was thus necessary to build trust, and for the sovereign investors to recognise the rebalancing of the global economy, and global interconnectedness.

He said he was optimistic that the decisions taken in Kuwait by the members of the new forum would contribute to a recovery of global capital flows and the investment environment.

The forum will operate in an inclusive manner and facilitate communication among SWFs, as well as with relevant recipient country officials, the European Commission, the OECD, representatives of other multilateral organisations, and the private sector. The forum has also established three sub-committees to work on (i) experiences in the application of Santiago Principles to date, (ii) investment and risk management practices, (iii) international investment
environment and recipient country relationships.

The forum will conduct its inaugural meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan in October, organised by the State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Government of Azerbaijan.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous