Instos “suppress” their home country biases

Institutional investors continued to suppress home country biases and globalise equity portfolios during 2009, a year in which risk appetite returned as equity markets rallied and short-dated credit strategies thrived, according to manager search data from Mercer Investment Consulting.

Mercer clients were most interested in global equity markets, commissioning the consultant to perform 191 searches, in which $25.8 billion was invested. This represented a 25 per cent increase in the number of searches completed in the previous year.

However searches for fixed-income managers increased at the most dramatic rate, shooting up from 25 in 2008 to 92 in 2009 as investors were attracted to short-dated credit and convertible bond strategies.

While the number of real estate searches rose to 67, close to pre-credit crunch levels, the number of searches for domestic equity managers declined in most regions.

Overall, Mercer undertook 826 manager searches in 2009, a rise of 22 per cent from the previous year, as risk appetite returned as markets recovered from the financial crisis and compelling opportunities arose, said Andy Barber, global head of manager research.

Sponsored Content

“Although there are regional variations, we do sense a greater investor appetite for taking advantage of dislocation and low valuations than in previous market downturns,” Barber said in an announcement.

“For both corporate bonds and real estate, an element of pent-up demand was realised in 2009 as many investors had been waiting for more realistic prices before committing new money.”

The number of searches instituted by Australian investors almost doubled from 61 to 120, although the volume of assets placed dropped from $15.2 billion to $7.7 billion, reflecting a trend for smaller placements, said Marianne Feeley, head of manager research in Asia-Pacific.

But in Asia, search activity fell by a third as investors were more concerned with reviewing their manager line-ups rather than taking on new exposures, Feeley said.

In the UK and Europe, the number of searches rose to 245 from 189, with assets placed rising to $41.9 billion, while in North America there was no substantial change.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous