Global equities lose ground to alternatives

Allocations to alternatives worldwide are expected to increase by more than 5 per cent at the expense of global equities in the next two years, according to Russell Investments 2010 global survey on alternative investing.

Infrastructure allocations are expected to increase most meaningfully relative to the other asset classes, albeit from a very low base, the also survey found.

“Infrastructure and commodities are becoming more important to institutions around the globe. They are expected to represent an important share of overall growth in allocations to alternatives through 2012, though from a very low base,” the report said.

Private equity allocations are expected to increase, especially in North America, based on a combination of valuation improvements and new commitments.

The increase in allocation to alternatives will come at the expense of global equities because the crisis highlighted the systematic risk of global equities, the survey found.

Sponsored Content

“The higher correlations between global equity sectors, styles and regions since 2008 have increased interest in alternative strategies that can help to diversify portfolios and reduce equity beta exposure, the survey said.

Reducing volatility was the main motivation for increasing allocations, according to the survey of 119 institutional investors managing a total of $1.3 trillion in assets, followed by improving returns and better risk-adjusted performance.

The survey was conducted by Russell in conjunction with McKinsey & Company.

Alternative types as a percentage of total portfolio assets

Type  2009  expected by 2012

Private equity  3.1%  4.9%

Hedge funds  4.2%  5.7%

Real estate 4.1%  6.6%

Infrastructure  0.3% 1.4%

Commodities 0.7%  1.1%

Totals  12.4%*  19.7%

*Note: the 12.4 per cent total above is the sum of allocations to each type, and it is drawn from a different survey question than the 14 per cent ‘total allocation’. The 1.6% difference may be to un-categorised alternative allocations (not assigned to a specific type).

Source: Russell Investments

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous