GIC cuts developed allocations as growth slows

The Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) will continue to increase its allocation to emerging economies and cut back on its exposure to developed markets because of concerns over slowing growth.

GIC, which manages $100 billion of the island state’s reserves, said in its annual report that it had achieved a 20-year annualised return of 7.2 per cent in US dollar terms by the end of March.

During the previous year to end of March, GIC had decreased it allocation to developed markets from 41 per cent to 34 per cent, while increasing its allocation to emerging markets from 10 per cent to 15 per cent of the portfolio.

“The developed economies, in particular the United States and Europe, are recovering from the global financial crisis,” Ng Kok Song, GIC’s chief investment officer (pictured) said.

“However their longer term outlook is still uncertain and carries considerable macro financial and economic risks. While the emerging economies in Asia and Latin America are growing strongly, their policy makers face challenges in restraining inflationary pressure and currency appreciation.”

The fund also achieved a marginal improvement on its annualised real return, in excess of global inflation, which increased to 3.9 per cent for the year ending March compared to 3.8 per cent for the previous 12 months.

Sponsored Content

For the first time the fund released nominal returns over the previous five years and over the last decade. Annualised returns for the past five year were 6.3 per cent net of fees with a volatility of 12 per cent. In the last 10 years the fund achieved an annualised return net of fees of 7.4 per cent with volatility of 10 per cent.

It contrasted these returns to two composite portfolios consisting of a 60-40 equity/bond split and a 70-30 equity/bond split.

The rates of return for the composite portfolios were calculated using two indices – the MSCI All Countries Gross Total Return index for global equities and the Barclays Global Bonds Aggregate Index for Global Bonds.

Insert Table:

Ng attributed the returns to the recovery in equity markets.

GIC invests almost all of its assets overseas. It flagged its intention to increase its exposure to emerging markets as far back as 2003, when it classified emerging market equities as an asset class in their own right.

In further asset allocation changes last year GIC increased its allocation to bonds from 20 per cent last year to 22 per cent this year.

GIC also marginally lifted its alternatives’ allocation to 26 per cent of the portfolio.

Within alternatives GIC’s real estate holdings ticked up from 9 per cent to 10 per cent. Private equity and infrastructure stayed steady at 10 per cent, as did natural resources and absolute returns which were both 3 per cent of the portfolio.

Cash decreased from 4 to 3 per cent.

Ng said the fund was looking to diversify its holdings across a number of countries and this has led the fund to reduce its European equity holdings from 30 per cent in 2010 to 28 per cent and its US holdings from 36 per cent to 33 per cent.

The fund – which is tasked with using foreign reserves and budget surpluses to provide a buffer against future crisis and meet spending needs – doubled its investments in Latin America from 2 per cent to 4 per cent.

Asia saw the biggest increase in investment from the sovereign wealth fund, with GIC investing 27 per cent in Japan, China and Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan compared with 24 per cent last year.

The fund has also seen recent changes at board level.

In May, former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew stepped aside as GIC chairman for his son, Lee Hsien Loong, who is the current Prime Minister. Lee Kuan Yew will stay on as GIC senior adviser so, as the fund says, it can “have the benefit of his vast experience, extensive network of contacts, and geopolitical insights”.

In June GIC deputy chairman and executive director, Tony Tan Keng Yam resigned. GIC director, Lim Hng Kiang, was appointed as acting chairman of the fund’s real estate arm and director Ang Kong Hua was appointed acting chairman of GIC Special Investments.

GIC is currently conducting a search for a replacement executive director.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous