GIC adopts dynamic asset allocation

The Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) has made changes to its investment policy introducing a ‘facility for medium-term strategy with regard to asset allocation’, as its allocation to developed market equities increase from 28 to 41 per cent in the past financial year.The GIC, which has more than $100 billion invested primarily outside of Singapore, will be able to make departures from the policy portfolio for the first time.

In its end of financial year report it says: the medium-term strategy facility will enable GIC management, with approval of the board, to make calibrated departures from the policy portfolio.

“The policy portfolio is an anchor of GIC’s investment process for allocating and rebalancing exposures to various asset classes. In this way, GIC can respond more flexibly to significant risks or opportunities, which are likely to emerge from time to time in an environment of greater uncertainty.”

Its other key strategic investment decision is to continue to allocate more to the emerging economies, especially in Asia. This is a deliberate progression of a strategy that began in 2003 when GIC focused on emerging market equities as an asset class in its own right.

In the last quarter of this year the GIC, which employs more than 1,000 people, will open its ninth office in Mumbai.

At the beginning of July this year, several senior appointments were made: Lim Kee Chong, Goh Kok Huat, and Tay Lim Hock were appointed deputy presidents of the public markets, real estate and special investments groups respectively. Chia Tai Tee assumed the appointment of deputy chief risk officer. Jeffrey Jaensubhakij and Ho Nyuk Chong were appointed managing directors.

Sponsored Content

In the past financial year the GIC made a significant change to the asset allocation strategy which saw the repurchase of developed market equities resulting in an allocation increase from 28 to 41 per cent. Investments in fixed income and cash fell from 32 to 24 per cent as a result.

Previously, from July 2007 to September 2008 GIC de-risked the portfolio, selling developed market equities.

Asset allocation to financial year March 2010

asset class March 2010 March 2009
public equities
developed markets 41% 28%
emerging markets 10 10
fixed income
nominal bonds 17 19
inflation-linked bonds 3 5
alternatives
real estate 9 12
PE, VC, infrastructure 10 11
absolute return 3 3
natural resources 3 4
cash and others 4 8

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous