Future Fund chief departs, alternative weightings increase

Paul Costello

Four years after becoming its first employee, Paul Costello will leave his role as general manager of Australia’s Future Fund, saying “new leadership” was appropriate now that the A$87 billion ($81.2 billion) vehicle was beyond its “startup phase.”

In that time the fund, which began investing in June 2007, has moved to a highly diversified position that includes 15.6 per cent in alternatives – where skilled managers are used to take advantage of capital scarcity and market inefficiency through a diverse range of strategies – 4.5 per cent in infrastructure, and 3 per cent in private equity.

In the year to June 30, 2010 the fund has deployed more than 28 per cent of its cash, with alternatives and global equities the main beneficiaries. The alternatives allocation, for instance, has increased from 5 to 15.6 per cent in the past year.

Costello said he will remain in his role for another couple of months, to “facilitate a smooth transition” to a new leader of the Future Fund Management Agency, Melbourne.

The fund’s board of guardians said it already was searching for a replacement, and would look locally and offshore.

Board chairman David Murray paid tribute to Costello, particularly for his role in “recruiting a skilled team to develop and implement the investment program.”

Sponsored Content

From holding an initial $18 billion in a cash account, the fund under chief investment officer, David Neal, now has more than 60 partnerships with global investment managers.

David Murray, chair of the fund’s board of guardians, said cash was deployed into strategies “consistent with our long-term objective”.

Murray said the design of the portfolio meant the fund was less reliant on equity markets to generate returns, than other investors.

During the year the fund moved its debt program, which remains a significant part of the portfolio at 21.9 per cent, away from holdings built opportunistically during the early stages of the credit crisis, to longer-term and higher yielding securities.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous