Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield.

The latest investor trends report from eVestment shows the US foundation and endowment universe to be moving assets out of their largest allocations of US large cap value, core fixed income, large cap growth, interim duration fixed income and core plus fixed income.

As a result of the low-yield environment, these investors are increasing allocations towards cost-effective, passive, global equity exposures and higher-yield and longer duration fixed income. According to the eVestment report, in changing from low and interim duration US fixed income, these investors have allocated to funds which have been increasing their cash positions, reducing their yield to maturity, but also increasing average weighted coupon, portfolio maturity and duration.

Further these investors are favouring strategies that have shifted their portfolios away from AAA to BBB.

“In order to maintain a certain level of yield, they have been forced to move out on the credit spectrum. This is generally true for any non-alternative strategies that have operated with specific return expectations,” the report says.

It also says that allocations to the hedge funds industry have accelerated over the last three quarters.

Sponsored Content

Throughout 2013 there were large inflows to credit and multi-strategy funds and entering 2014 investors have heavily increased allocations to long/short equity and event driven strategies, all of which appear to be at the expense of manage futures and macro strategies.

“With multiple surveys illustrating interest in hedge funds, private equity and real assets, along with what have been large aggregate flows into alternative credit strategies, foundations and endowments have been active in searching for new sources of yield and return credit markets while also attempting to reduce exposure to directional movements in rate markets.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous