Emerging and frontier markets continue darling run

Global equity markets significantly underperformed emerging and frontier markets in 2010, evidenced by MSCI Indices end of  year data, with some emerging markets returning as much as 50 per cent and some frontier markest returning 70 per cent for the year.While overall global equity markets continued to recover, the MSCI data demonstrated that emerging and frontier markets recovered more strongly than developed markets in 2010.

The MSCI Thailand and MSCI Peru indices were the strongest performers among the emerging markets, posting returns of 49.9 per cent and 47.8 per cent respectively. While within this market segment, the MSCI Hungary index was ranked the poorest performer, with a return of -12.0 per cent with the MSCI Czech Republic index coming in next with a -11.0 per cent return.

Frontier markets made a comeback in 2010 after significantly lagging behind developed and emerging markets in 2009 with a return of 7.0 per cent. Overall they more than doubled this, posting a return of 18.3 per cent.

The MSCI Sri Lanka index was the top performer for frontier markets, posting a 73.2 per cent return, with the MSCI Bahrain index last among the frontier classification with a return of -23.0 per cent.

Within developed markest the US index returned 13.21 per cent, outperforming the European index which suffered due to the sovereign debt crisis. Despite that, Sweden was named the top performing index among developed markets, posting a return of 29.0 per cent.

The MSCI global small cap indexes repeated the success of 2009 in outperforming the MSCI global standard (large + mid cap) indexes across all regions. The MSCI small cap index outpaced its large and mid cap counterpart, MSCI ACWI, by more than 10 percentage points, posting returns of 23.2 per cent compared to MSCI ACWI’s return of 9.7 per cent. The large cap indices have a challenge in the coming year if it is to prevent the MSCI global small cap indices from completing an outperformance hat trick in the coming year.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous