Eijffinger’s decade of financial repression

Financial repression will define the economic landscape for at least another decade, according to professor of financial economics at Tilburg University, Sylvester Eijffinger, which has serious implications for institutional investors.

Eijffinger, who also is also a visiting professor at Harvard, sits on the monetary experts panel of the European Union and is an adviser to the International Monetary Fund, says negative interest rates are the major issue of our time.

Negative real interest rates are here to stay, a realisation that has huge implications for investors.

“Governments have to de-leverage risk in times of low growth and they are not prepared to increase taxes; they have to do it with financial repression,” he says. “As an investor, be prepared. You have to realise that low interest rates are here to stay at the short-end and possibly at the long-end of the yield curve. This has huge implications for investments.”

By way of example, he says the European Central Bank’s policy rate stands at 0.5 per cent, while the eurozone’s annual inflation rate is 2.5 per cent. The Bank of England keeps its policy rate at only 0.5 per cent, despite an inflation rate that hovers above 2 per cent. And, in the United States, where inflation exceeds 2 per cent, the Federal Reserve’s benchmark federal funds rate remains at an historic low of 0 to 0.25 per cent.

This will be the financial and economic environment of the immediate future.

Sponsored Content

He says negative interest rates, which he describes as a kind of wealth tax, are necessary for governments to de-risk, but they come at the expense of savers.

“People who save should be aware that governments need to do this for at least a decade,” he says.

Eijffinger will give a keynote address at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium, an event that brings together institutional investors to examine the power and responsibility of fiduciary investment.

The event, which is convened by Conexus Financial, the publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, will be held in Amsterdam from October 20 to 22, 2013. www.fiduciaryinvestor.com

Read an article by Eijffinger on the subject here.

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement and troubling policy implications

This paper by New York University’s Jonas Prager outlines the major changes in the financial structure as well as the focal events that characterised the 2007-2008 global financial crisis and considers the evidence for the crucial role played by misaligned incentives. Misaligned incentives, bank mismanagement, and troubling policy implications mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous